* and on the Java module path.</p>
 *
 * <h2>Relationship with Java compiler standard location</h2>
 * This enumeration is closely related to the {@link JavaFileManager.Location} enumerations.
 * A difference is that the latter enumerates input and output files, while {@code JavaPathType}
 * enumerates only input dependencies. Another difference is that {@code JavaPathType} contains

* `instagram_basic` is used by Facebook / Instagram.
* `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive` is used by Google.

/// info

In OAuth2 a "scope" is just a string that declares a specific permission required.

It doesn't matter if it has other characters like `:` or if it is a URL.

Those details are implementation specific.

For OAuth2 they are just strings.

///

## Global view { #global-view }

    testDecodes(ignoreCase, "666F6F626172", "foobar");
    testDecodes(ignoreCase, "666f6f626172", "foobar");
    testDecodes(ignoreCase, "666F6f626172", "foobar");
  }

  // order the methods are called should not matter
  public void testBase16IgnoreCaseLowerCase() {
    BaseEncoding ignoreCase = base16().ignoreCase().lowerCase();
    assertThat(ignoreCase).isNotSameInstanceAs(base16());

    }
    for (Service service : services) {
      try {
        state.tryStartTiming(service);
        service.startAsync();
      } catch (IllegalStateException e) {
        // This can happen if the service has already been started or stopped (e.g. by another
        // service or listener). Our contract says it is safe to call this method if

  public void testContainsAll() {
    Range<Integer> range = Range.closed(3, 5);
    assertTrue(range.containsAll(asList(3, 3, 4, 5)));
    assertFalse(range.containsAll(asList(3, 3, 4, 5, 6)));

    // We happen to know that natural-order sorted sets use a different code
    // path, so we test that separately
    assertTrue(range.containsAll(ImmutableSortedSet.of(3, 3, 4, 5)));
    assertTrue(range.containsAll(ImmutableSortedSet.of(3)));

        // So now we have an url of the form file://<path>

        // We want to eliminate any relative path nonsense and lock down the path so we
        // need to fully resolve it before any submodules use the path. This can happen
        // when you are using a custom settings.xml that contains a relative path entry
        // for the local repository setting.

        File localRepository = new File(url.substring("file://".length()));

            throws ArtifactResolutionException {
        fireEvent(ResolutionListener.TEST_ARTIFACT, listeners, node);

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);
        }

	DB.Save(&user1).Save(&user2).Save(&user3)

	rows, err := DB.Table("users").Where("name = ? or name = ?", user2.Name, user3.Name).Select("name, age").Rows()
	if err != nil {
		t.Errorf("Not error should happen, got %v", err)
	}

	count := 0
	for rows.Next() {
		var name string
		var age int64
		rows.Scan(&name, &age)
		count++
	}

	if count != 2 {
		t.Errorf("Should found two records")
	}
}

  public void testPartiallyConstructedManager_transitionAfterAddListenerBeforeStateIsReady() {
    // The implementation of this test is pretty sensitive to the implementation :( but we want to
    // ensure that if weird things happen during construction then we get exceptions.
    NoOpService service1 = new NoOpService();
    // This service will start service1 when addListener is called.  This simulates service1 being
    // started asynchronously.

If you check the previous app, in the UI you can see that, up to now, it lets the client decide the `id` of the `Hero` to create. 😱

We shouldn't let that happen, they could overwrite an `id` we already have assigned in the DB. Deciding the `id` should be done by the **backend** or the **database**, **not by the client**.