* @return the implied set of features
   */
  public static Set<Feature<?>> impliedFeatures(Set<Feature<?>> features) {
    Set<Feature<?>> impliedSet = new LinkedHashSet<>();
    Queue<Feature<?>> queue = new ArrayDeque<>(features);
    while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
      Feature<?> feature = queue.remove();
      for (Feature<?> implied : feature.getImpliedFeatures()) {
        if (!features.contains(implied) && impliedSet.add(implied)) {

  
  Portworx CSI driver is required to enable migration.
  This PR adds support of the `CSIMigrationPortworx` feature gate, which can be enabled by:
  
  1. Adding the feature flag to the kube-controller-manager `--feature-gates=CSIMigrationPortworx=true` 
  2. Adding the feature flag to the kubelet config:
  
  featureGates:

	if unMarshalXLMeta.Erasure.ParityBlocks != jsoniterXLMeta.Erasure.ParityBlocks {
		t.Errorf("Expected the erasure parity blocks to be %v, but got %v.", unMarshalXLMeta.Erasure.ParityBlocks, jsoniterXLMeta.Erasure.ParityBlocks)
	}
	if unMarshalXLMeta.Erasure.BlockSize != jsoniterXLMeta.Erasure.BlockSize {
		t.Errorf("Expected the erasure block size to be %v, but got %v.", unMarshalXLMeta.Erasure.BlockSize, jsoniterXLMeta.Erasure.BlockSize)
	}

* The dynamic Kubelet config feature is now beta, and the DynamicKubeletConfig feature gate is on by default. In order to use dynamic Kubelet config, ensure that the Kubelet's --dynamic-config-dir option is set.  ([#64275](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/64275), [@mtaufen](https://github.com/mtaufen))

  }

  private static Set<Feature<?>> computeReserializedMapFeatures(Set<Feature<?>> mapFeatures) {
    Set<Feature<?>> derivedFeatures = copyToSet(mapFeatures);
    derivedFeatures.remove(CollectionFeature.SERIALIZABLE);
    derivedFeatures.remove(CollectionFeature.SERIALIZABLE_INCLUDING_VIEWS);
    return derivedFeatures;
  }

  private static Set<Feature<?>> computeEntrySetFeatures(Set<Feature<?>> mapFeatures) {

   * @return the implied set of features
   */
  public static Set<Feature<?>> impliedFeatures(Set<Feature<?>> features) {
    Set<Feature<?>> impliedSet = new LinkedHashSet<>();
    Queue<Feature<?>> queue = new ArrayDeque<>(features);
    while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
      Feature<?> feature = queue.remove();
      for (Feature<?> implied : feature.getImpliedFeatures()) {
        if (!features.contains(implied) && impliedSet.add(implied)) {

		t.Fatal(err)
	}
	if formatV3.Erasure.This != m.Erasure.Disk {
		t.Fatalf("expected drive uuid: %s, got: %s", m.Erasure.Disk, formatV3.Erasure.This)
	}
	if len(formatV3.Erasure.Sets) != 1 {
		t.Fatalf("expected single set after migrating from v1 to v3, but found %d", len(formatV3.Erasure.Sets))
	}
	if !reflect.DeepEqual(formatV3.Erasure.Sets[0], m.Erasure.JBOD) {

name: Feature Addition Request
description: I want to add a new feature
labels: ["type=addition"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.


        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our

              .withTearDown(parentBuilder.getTearDown())
              .createTestSuite());
    }

    return derived;
  }

  private static Set<Feature<?>> computeInverseFeatures(Set<Feature<?>> mapFeatures) {
    Set<Feature<?>> inverseFeatures = new HashSet<>(mapFeatures);

    boolean nullKeys = inverseFeatures.remove(MapFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_KEYS);

	benchmarkPutObject(b, "Erasure", 10)
}

// BenchmarkPutObject10KbFS - Benchmark FS.PutObject() for object size of 10KB.
func BenchmarkPutObject10KbFS(b *testing.B) {
	benchmarkPutObject(b, "FS", 10*humanize.KiByte)
}

// BenchmarkPutObject10KbErasure - Benchmark Erasure.PutObject() for object size of 10KB.
func BenchmarkPutObject10KbErasure(b *testing.B) {
	benchmarkPutObject(b, "Erasure", 10*humanize.KiByte)
}