*/

package com.google.common.hash;

import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Explicitly named subinterface of {@link Supplier} that can be marked {@literal @}{@link
 * Immutable}.
 */
// TODO(cpovirk): Should we just use ChecksumType directly instead of defining this type?
@Immutable

              },
              "invalid": {
                "delay": 0,
                "message": "This was marked as invalid and will be closed now. If this is an error, please provide additional details."
              }

vice-2","at_hash":"LL4jvrkBRNQhOKiC83RL","aud":"minio-client-app","c_hash":"fjGB4ldChsaf9vSFdZ1P","email":"******@****.***","email_verified":true,"groups":["projecta","projectb"],"iat":1726558680,"iss":"http://127.0.0.1:5556/dex","name":"Dillon Harper","parent":"oCnAoSQFtdVQtKwrB73j","preferred_username":"dillon","roleArn":"arn:minio:iam:::role/nOybJqMNzNmroqEKq5D0","sa-policy":"inherited-policy","sub":"Cit1aWQ9ZGlsbG9uLG91"},"sessionPolicy":null,"status":"on","name":"","description":"","expir...

                        IllegalArgumentException.class),

                // Name length larger than remaining bytes - use method reference
                Arguments.of("name length exceeds remaining", (java.util.function.Supplier<byte[]>) () -> {
                    byte[] buf = buildBuffer(der, nameBytes);
                    // Corrupt NAME_LEN to be larger than actual by +5
                    int i = 2 + 2 + der.length; // index where NAME_LEN starts

        }
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test decode with larger buffer and length")
    void testDecodeWithLargerBufferAndLength() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
        // Test with buffer and length larger than needed
        byte[] buffer = new byte[100];

        // Fill test pattern
        for (int i = 0; i < buffer.length; i++) {

For urgent issues (e.g. production down, etc.), subscribe to [SUBNET](https://min.io/pricing?jmp=github) for direct to engineering support.
 
<!--- Provide a general summary of the issue in the Title above -->

-   [guava-discuss: For open-ended questions and discussion](https://groups.google.com/group/guava-discuss)

## IMPORTANT WARNINGS

1. APIs marked with the `@Beta` annotation at the class or method level
are subject to change. They can be modified in any way, or even
removed, at any time. If your code is a library itself (i.e. it is

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The main components are:</p>
 * <ul>
 *   <li>{@link org.apache.maven.api.cli.Invoker} - Base interface for executing Maven tools</li>
 *   <li>{@link org.apache.maven.api.cli.Parser} - Processes command-line arguments into invoker requests</li>
 *   <li>{@link org.apache.maven.api.cli.Options} - Represents Maven configuration options</li>

 * features}, the features supported by the iterator; and {@code expectedElements}, the elements the
 * iterator should return in order.
 *
 * <p>The items in {@code elementsToInsert} will be repeated if {@code steps} is larger than the
 * number of provided elements.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public abstract class ListIteratorTester<E extends @Nullable Object>

      throw new SkipThisScenarioException();
    }
  }

  // This exclusion doesn't exclude the TOMBSTONE objects we set. So 'done' NEW futures will look
  // larger than they are.
  @SuppressWarnings("FutureReturnValueIgnored")
  @Footprint(exclude = {Runnable.class, Executor.class, Thread.class, Exception.class})
  public Object measureSize() {
    for (Thread thread : blockedThreads) {