* whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getSetNullSupportedMethod() {
    return getMethod(ListSetTester.class, "testSet_null");
  }

   * inputs, regardless of how the elements are divided.
   */
  @SafeVarargs
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // TODO(cpovirk): Remove after we fix whatever the bug is.
  public final CollectorTester<T, A, R> expectCollects(R expectedResult, T... inputs) {
    List<T> list = Arrays.asList(inputs);
    doExpectCollects(expectedResult, list);

          // I regard highly unlikely that both the little endianness tests above and this one
          // passes, and there is still a little endianness bug lurking around.
        }
      }

      Control control = new Control();
      Hasher controlSink = control.newHasher(1024);

      Iterable<Hasher> sinksAndControl =

  public void testKeyType() {
    EnumHashBiMap<Currency, String> bimap = EnumHashBiMap.create(Currency.class);
    assertEquals(Currency.class, bimap.keyType());
  }

  public void testEntrySet() {
    // Bug 3168290
    Map<Currency, String> map =
        ImmutableMap.of(
            Currency.DOLLAR, "dollar",
            Currency.PESO, "peso",
            Currency.FRANC, "franc");

  }

  public void testBuilder_presize_negative() {
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> ImmutableDoubleArray.builder(-1));
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {

  }

  public void testBuilder_presize_negative() {
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> ImmutableIntArray.builder(-1));
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {

* Fix a bug where kubelet would not retry pod sandbox creation when the restart policy of the pod is Never ([#79451](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/79451), [@yujuhong](https://github.com/yujuhong))

        assertNull(resultArray[0]);
        assertEquals("actualValue", resultArray[1]);
    }

    /**
     * Test array index calculation correctness
     * This verifies the fix for the original bug where values[values.length - 1 + i]
     * would cause ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
     */
    @Test
    public void test_arrayIndexCalculation() {
        TestFessTransformer transformer = new TestFessTransformer();

    - [SIG Scheduling](#sig-scheduling-1)
    - [SIG Storage](#sig-storage-1)
    - [SIG VMWare](#sig-vmware-1)
    - [SIG Windows](#sig-windows-1)
  - [Other Notable Changes](#other-notable-changes-11)
    - [Bug Fixes](#bug-fixes)
    - [Not Very Notable (that is, non-user-facing)](#not-very-notable-that-is-non-user-facing)
  - [External Dependencies](#external-dependencies)
- [v1.12.0-rc.2](#v1120-rc2)

    }

    // --- as(Class, DLSequence, int) ---

    @Test
    void testAs_DLSequence_RecursiveBug() {
        // This test exposes a recursive bug in the current implementation
        // The method calls itself, leading to a StackOverflowError.
        ASN1EncodableVector vector = new ASN1EncodableVector();
        vector.add(new ASN1Integer(10));