Search Options

Results per page
Sort
Preferred Languages
Advance

Results 141 - 150 of 162 for Benchmark (0.05 sec)

  1. docs/tr/docs/async.md

    ### Eşzamanlılık paralellikten daha mı iyi?
    
    Hayır!  Hikayenin ahlakı bu değil.
    
    Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025
    - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025
    - 21.8K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  2. cmd/erasure-decode_test.go

    		}
    		got := buf.Bytes()
    		if !bytes.Equal(expected, got) {
    			t.Fatalf("read data is different from what was expected, offset=%d length=%d", offset, readLen)
    		}
    		buf.Reset()
    	}
    }
    
    // Benchmarks
    
    func benchmarkErasureDecode(data, parity, dataDown, parityDown int, size int64, b *testing.B) {
    	setup, err := newErasureTestSetup(b, data, parity, blockSizeV2)
    	if err != nil {
    Registered: Sun Dec 28 19:28:13 UTC 2025
    - Last Modified: Fri Aug 29 02:39:48 UTC 2025
    - 21K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  3. docs/ru/docs/async.md

    ### Конкурентность лучше параллелизма? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }
    
    Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025
    - Last Modified: Tue Sep 30 11:24:39 UTC 2025
    - 38.5K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  4. docs/tr/docs/alternatives.md

    ///
    
    ## Karşılaştırma ve Hız
    
    Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025
    - Last Modified: Sat Oct 11 17:48:49 UTC 2025
    - 28.7K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  5. docs/uk/docs/alternatives.md

    ///
    
    ## Орієнтири та швидкість
    
    Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025
    - Last Modified: Sat Oct 11 17:48:49 UTC 2025
    - 38.1K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  6. guava/src/com/google/common/util/concurrent/CycleDetectingLockFactory.java

     * weak references.
     *
     * <p><strong>Performance</strong>
     *
     * <p>The extra bookkeeping done by cycle detecting locks comes at some cost to performance.
     * Benchmarks (as of December 2011) show that:
     *
     * <ul>
     *   <li>for an unnested {@code lock()} and {@code unlock()}, a cycle detecting lock takes 38ns as
     *       opposed to the 24ns taken by a plain lock.
    Registered: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 UTC 2025
    - Last Modified: Thu Sep 11 17:06:34 UTC 2025
    - 35.9K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  7. docs/pt/docs/async.md

    ### Concorrência é melhor que paralelismo? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }
    
    Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025
    - Last Modified: Wed Nov 12 16:23:57 UTC 2025
    - 25.8K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  8. docs/en/docs/async.md

    And as you can have parallelism and asynchronicity at the same time, you get higher performance than most of the tested NodeJS frameworks and on par with Go, which is a compiled language closer to C <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(all thanks to Starlette)</a>.
    
    ### Is concurrency better than parallelism? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }
    
    Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025
    - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025
    - 24K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  9. docs/es/docs/async.md

    Y como puedes tener paralelismo y asincronía al mismo tiempo, obtienes un mayor rendimiento que la mayoría de los frameworks de NodeJS probados y a la par con Go, que es un lenguaje compilado más cercano a C <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(todo gracias a Starlette)</a>.
    
    ### ¿Es la concurrencia mejor que el paralelismo? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }
    
    Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025
    - Last Modified: Wed Dec 17 10:15:01 UTC 2025
    - 25.4K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  10. docs/de/docs/async.md

    ### Ist Nebenläufigkeit besser als Parallelität? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }
    
    Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025
    - Last Modified: Sat Sep 20 15:10:09 UTC 2025
    - 27.9K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
Back to top