public void tearDown() throws Exception {
    /*
     * Clear interrupt for future tests.
     *
     * (Ideally we would perform interrupts only in threads that we create, but
     * it's hard to imagine that anything will break in practice.)
     */
    clearInterrupt();
    aggregateFutureLogger.removeHandler(aggregateFutureLogHandler);
    super.tearDown();
  }

  /*

            ingestFactory = ComponentUtil.getIngestFactory();
        }
    }

    /**
     * Destroys the IndexUpdater when the container is shutting down.
     * Stops all crawler instances if crawling is still in progress.
     */
    @PreDestroy
    public void destroy() {
        if (!finishCrawling) {
            if (logger.isInfoEnabled()) {
                logger.info("Stopping all crawlers.");
            }

   * {@code true}. The components are evaluated in order, and evaluation will be "short-circuited"
   * as soon as a false predicate is found. It defensively copies the iterable passed in, so future
   * changes to it won't alter the behavior of this predicate. If {@code components} is empty, the
   * returned predicate will always evaluate to {@code true}.
   *

   * values are not supported.
   *
   * <p>Lookups by row key are often faster than lookups by column key, because the data is stored
   * in a {@code Map<R, Map<C, V>>}. A method call like {@code column(columnKey).get(rowKey)} still
   * runs quickly, since the row key is provided. However, {@code column(columnKey).size()} takes
   * longer, since an iteration across all row keys occurs.
   *

    --hash=sha256:fd4ec41f914fa74ad1b8304bbc634b3de73d2a0889bd32076342a573e0779e00 \
    --hash=sha256:ffc9202a29ab3920fa812879e95a9e78b2465fd10be7fcbd042899695d75e616
    # via requests
dill==0.3.7 \
    --hash=sha256:76b122c08ef4ce2eedcd4d1abd8e641114bfc6c2867f49f3c41facf65bf19f5e \
    --hash=sha256:cc1c8b182eb3013e24bd475ff2e9295af86c1a38eb1aff128dac8962a9ce3c03

    --hash=sha256:fd4ec41f914fa74ad1b8304bbc634b3de73d2a0889bd32076342a573e0779e00 \
    --hash=sha256:ffc9202a29ab3920fa812879e95a9e78b2465fd10be7fcbd042899695d75e616
    # via requests
dill==0.3.7 \
    --hash=sha256:76b122c08ef4ce2eedcd4d1abd8e641114bfc6c2867f49f3c41facf65bf19f5e \
    --hash=sha256:cc1c8b182eb3013e24bd475ff2e9295af86c1a38eb1aff128dac8962a9ce3c03

   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(float[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);
        }

        List<ResolutionNode> previousNodes = resolvedArtifacts.get(key);

      // the null value might be out of bounds, so we can't always construct a subset with nulls
      features.add(CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES);
      // but add null might still be supported if it happens to be within range of the subset
      suppressing.add(CollectionAddTester.getAddNullUnsupportedMethod());
      suppressing.add(CollectionAddAllTester.getAddAllNullUnsupportedMethod());
    }

    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());

    // Start the task to put it in the RUNNING state.  Have to use a separate
    // thread because the task will block on the task latch after unblocking
    // the run latch.
    exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());