return new Tuple3<>(value1, value2, value3);
    }

    /**
     * Constructs an instance.
     */
    public Tuple3() {
    }

    /**
     * Constructs an instance.
     *
     * @param value1
     *            The first value
     * @param value2
     *            The second value
     * @param value3

     * If either or both arrays have a length of {@literal 0}, the other array is returned as is.
     * In any case, the returned array is the same instance as the argument array and is not copied.
     * </p>
     *
     * @param <T>
     *            the type of the array elements
     * @param a
     *            first array
     * @param b

<components namespace="fessCrawler">
	<include path="crawler/container.xml" />

	<component name="intervalController"
		class="org.codelibs.fess.crawler.interval.FessIntervalController"
		instance="prototype">
	</component>

 * limitations under the License.
 */
package com.google.common.collect;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;

/**
 * A dummy superclass of {@link ImmutableMultimap} that can be instanceof'd without ProGuard
 * retaining additional implementation details of {@link ImmutableMultimap}.
 */
@GwtCompatible

   */
  @Override
  public Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  /**
   * Compares the specified object to this multimap for equality.
   *
   * <p>Two {@code ListMultimap} instances are equal if, for each key, they contain the same values
   * in the same order. If the value orderings disagree, the multimaps will not be considered equal.
   */
  @Override

    return CompactHashSet.create();
  }

  /** Equivalent to Arrays.copyOfRange(source, from, to, arrayOfType.getClass()). */
  /*
   * Arrays are a mess from a nullness perspective, and Class instances for object-array types are
   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *

    return CompactHashSet.create();
  }

  /** Equivalent to Arrays.copyOfRange(source, from, to, arrayOfType.getClass()). */
  /*
   * Arrays are a mess from a nullness perspective, and Class instances for object-array types are
   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *

import org.apache.maven.project.MavenProject;
import org.apache.maven.project.artifact.InvalidDependencyVersionException;

/**
 * Default component responsible for creation of MavenProject#dependencyArtifacts instances.
 */
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
@Named
public class DefaultProjectArtifactFactory implements ProjectArtifactFactory {
    private final ArtifactFactory artifactFactory;

    @Inject

                .withRootDirectory(invokerRequest.rootDirectory().orElse(null))
                .build();
    }

    public Logger logger;

    // this one "evolves" as process progresses (instance is immutable but instances are replaced)
    public ProtoSession protoSession;
    // here we track which user properties we pushed to Java System Properties (internal only)
    public Set<String> pushedUserProperties;

attached to a different loop` al integrar llamadas a funciones asíncronas en tus tests (por ejemplo, cuando usas [MotorClient de MongoDB](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41584243/runtimeerror-task-attached-to-a-different-loop)), recuerda crear instances de objetos que necesiten un loop de eventos solo dentro de funciones async, por ejemplo, en un callback `@app.on_event("startup")`.

///...