fw.println("#");
        fw.println("# The checker does not handle implicit section names, so they must be explicit and declared as: [[section-name]]");
        fw.println("#");

	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}

	// Remove the object - to simulate the case where the disk was down when the object
	// was created.
	err = removeAll(pathJoin(disk.String(), bucket, object))
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}

	// Checking abandoned parts should do nothing

	TotalUsedCapacity uint64 `json:"usedCapacity,omitempty"`
	TotalFreeCapacity uint64 `json:"freeCapacity,omitempty"`

	// LastUpdate is the timestamp of when the data usage info was last updated.
	// This does not indicate a full scan.
	LastUpdate time.Time `json:"lastUpdate"`

	// Objects total count across all buckets
	ObjectsTotalCount uint64 `json:"objectsCount"`

	// Versions total count across all buckets

			contains := containsReservedMetadata(test.header)
			if contains && !test.shouldFail {
				t.Errorf("contains reserved header but should not fail")
			} else if !contains && test.shouldFail {
				t.Errorf("does not contain reserved header but failed")
			}
		})
	}
}

var sseTLSHandlerTests = []struct {
	URL               *url.URL
	Header            http.Header
	IsTLS, ShouldFail bool
}{

protect against two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects incrementally. Storage servers once deployed should not require drive replacement or healing for the lifetime of the server....

			}
		}
		m.tlock.RUnlock()

	}
	return report
}

func (m *Monitor) trackEWMA() {
	for {
		select {
		case <-m.bucketMovingAvgTicker.C:
			m.updateMovingAvg()
		case <-m.ctx.Done():
			return
		}
	}
}

func (m *Monitor) updateMovingAvg() {
	m.mlock.Lock()
	defer m.mlock.Unlock()
	for _, bucketMeasurement := range m.bucketsMeasurement {

	}
	r.onReaderExit = func() {
		close(r.decoded)
		readCloser.Close()
		for range r.input {
			// Read until EOF trickles through.
			// Otherwise, we risk the decoder hanging.
		}
		r.readerWg.Done()
	}

	// We cannot reuse as we are sending parsed objects elsewhere.
	simdjson.ParseNDStream(readCloser, r.input, nil)
	r.readerWg.Add(1)
	go r.startReader()
	return &r
}

		panic(err)
	}

	time.Sleep(time.Duration(b[0]) * time.Millisecond)

	if target.sendErr {
		return errors.New("send error")
	}

	return nil
}

// SendFromStore - interface compatible method does no-op.
func (target *ExampleTarget) SendFromStore(_ store.Key) error {
	return nil
}

func (target ExampleTarget) Close() error {
	if target.closeErr {
		return errors.New("close error")
	}

	return nil

        super.processCleanupCrawling(objs);
        if (objs.length > 1 && objs[1] instanceof final UrlQueue<?> urlQueue) {
            ComponentUtil.getCrawlerStatsHelper().done(urlQueue);
        }
    }

    @Override
    protected void processProcessChildUrlByException(final Object... objs) {
        super.processProcessChildUrlByException(objs);

import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;

@AndroidIncompatible
// TODO(cpovirk): Figure out Android JUnit 4 support. Does it work with Gingerbread? @RunWith?
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
public final class NetworkEquivalenceTest {
  private static final Integer N1 = 1;
  private static final Integer N2 = 2;
  private static final Integer N3 = 3;