synchronized (this.sidCache) {
            try (DcerpcHandle handle = DcerpcHandle.getHandle("ncacn_np:" + server + "[\\PIPE\\lsarpc]", tc)) {
                // NetApp doesn't like the 'generic' access mask values
                try (LsaPolicyHandle policyHandle = new LsaPolicyHandle(handle, null, 0x00000001)) {
                    rpc = new MsrpcQueryInformationPolicy(policyHandle, (short) lsarpc.POLICY_INFO_ACCOUNT_DOMAIN, info);

// input. The arguments are an initial substring of the remaining unprocessed
// data and a flag, atEOF, that reports whether the [Reader] has no more data
// to give. The return values are the number of bytes to advance the input
// and the next token to return to the user, if any, plus an error, if any.
//
// Scanning stops if the function returns an error, in which case some of

				}
			}
			// Since there are cases for which ListObjects fails, this is
			// necessary. Test passes as expected, but the output values
			// are verified for correctness here.
			if err == nil && testCase.shouldPass {
				// The length of the expected ListObjectsResult.Objects
				// should match in both expected result from test cases

   * surprising for implementations of {@code HashCode} that represent the number in big-endian
   * since everything else in the hashing API uniformly treats multibyte values as little-endian.
   *
   * <p>To create a {@code HashCode} from its string representation, see {@link #fromString}.
   */
  @Override
  public final String toString() {
    byte[] bytes = getBytesInternal();

        assertTrue(result.contains("serverTypes=SV_TYPE_DOMAIN_ENUM"));
        assertTrue(result.endsWith("]"));
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @DisplayName("Test constants values")
    @CsvSource({ "SV_TYPE_ALL, -1", "SV_TYPE_DOMAIN_ENUM, -2147483648" })
    void testConstants(String constantName, int expectedValue) {
        if ("SV_TYPE_ALL".equals(constantName)) {

	h.Modified = t
	h.ModifiedDate, h.ModifiedTime = timeToMsDosTime(t)
}

const (
	// Unix constants. The specification doesn't mention them,
	// but these seem to be the values agreed on by tools.
	s_IFMT   = 0xf000
	s_IFSOCK = 0xc000
	s_IFLNK  = 0xa000
	s_IFREG  = 0x8000
	s_IFBLK  = 0x6000
	s_IFDIR  = 0x4000
	s_IFCHR  = 0x2000
	s_IFIFO  = 0x1000
	s_ISUID  = 0x800

    init {
      ecdsa256()
    }

    /**
     * Sets the certificate to be valid in ```[notBefore..notAfter]```. Both endpoints are specified
     * in the format of [System.currentTimeMillis]. Specify -1L for both values to use the default
     * interval, 24 hours starting when the certificate is created.
     */
    fun validityInterval(
      notBefore: Long,
      notAfter: Long,
    ) = apply {

   *  * For auth challenges (401: Unauthorized, 407: Proxy Authentication Required.)
   *  * For client timeouts (408: Request Time-Out.)
   *  * For server failures (503: Service Unavailable.)
   *
   * Response header values like `Location` and `Retry-After` are also considered.
   *
   * Client configuration may be used to make follow-up decisions, such as:
   *
   *  * [OkHttpClient.followRedirects] must be true to follow redirects.

    // have to have duplicate @GwtIncompatible test methods just to make that assertion.
    for (AssertFailsToDecodeStrategy strategy : AssertFailsToDecodeStrategy.values()) {
      strategy.assertFailsToDecode(encoding, cannotDecode, expectedMessage);
    }
  }

  enum AssertFailsToDecodeStrategy {
    CAN_DECODE {
      @Override
      void assertFailsToDecode(

  }

  public void checkSameResult(HashCode hashCode, long equivLong) {
    assertEquals(Hashing.consistentHash(equivLong, 5555), Hashing.consistentHash(hashCode, 5555));
  }

  /**
   * Check a few "golden" values to see that implementations across languages are equivalent.
   *
   */
  public void testConsistentHash_linearCongruentialGeneratorCompatibility() {
    int[] golden100 = {
      0, 55, 62, 8, 45, 59, 86, 97, 82, 59,