///

## Password hashing { #password-hashing }

"Hashing" means converting some content (a password in this case) into a sequence of bytes (just a string) that looks like gibberish.

Whenever you pass exactly the same content (exactly the same password) you get exactly the same gibberish.

But you cannot convert from the gibberish back to the password.

### Why use password hashing { #why-use-password-hashing }

So, the function below it will be executed once for each combination of arguments. And then the values returned by each of those combinations of arguments will be used again and again whenever the function is called with exactly the same combination of arguments.

For example, if you have a function:

```Python
@lru_cache
def say_hi(name: str, salutation: str = "Ms."):

- [KEK](#kek): A secret and unique key used to en/decrypt the OEK and never stored anywhere. It is(re-)generated whenever en/decrypting an object using an external secret key and public parameters.
- [EK](#ek): An external secret key - either the SSE-C client-provided key or a secret key generated by the KMS.

#### Content Encryption

```console
$ pip install "pydantic[email]"
```

///

And we are using this model to declare our input and the same model to declare our output:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Now, whenever a browser is creating a user with a password, the API will return the same password in the response.

In this case, it might not be a problem, because it's the same user sending the password.

     * try to merge the element attributes and values, rather than overriding the recessive element completely with the
     * dominant one. This means that wherever the dominant element doesn't provide the value or a particular attribute,
     * that value or attribute will be set from the recessive DOM node.
     */
    @Deprecated(since = "4.0.0", forRemoval = true)

 *
 * @param <InputT> the type of the individual inputs
 * @param <OutputT> the type of the output (i.e. this) future
 */
@GwtCompatible
@SuppressWarnings(
    // Whenever both tests are cheap and functional, it's faster to use &, | instead of &&, ||
    "ShortCircuitBoolean")
abstract class AggregateFuture<InputT extends @Nullable Object, OutputT extends @Nullable Object>

 *   <li><b>Shallow immutability.</b> Elements can never be added, removed or replaced in this
 *       collection. This is a stronger guarantee than that of {@link
 *       Collections#unmodifiableCollection}, whose contents change whenever the wrapped collection
 *       is modified.
 *   <li><b>Null-hostility.</b> This collection will never contain a null element.
 *   <li><b>Deterministic iteration.</b> The iteration order is always well-defined, depending on

   * NullPointerException if the comparator does. Since our construction
   * methods ensure that null is never present in the map, it's OK for the
   * comparator to look for it wherever it wants.
   *
   * Note that we do NOT touch the comparator returned by comparator(), which
   * should be identical to the one the user passed in. We touch only the

There you can select "Releases only".

By doing it, you will receive notifications (in your email) whenever there's a new release (a new version) of **FastAPI** with bug fixes and new features.

## Connect with the author { #connect-with-the-author }

    assertThrows(IllegalStateException.class, () -> builder2.weakValues());
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // Duration
  @IgnoreJRERequirement // No more dangerous than wherever the caller got the Duration from
  public void testLargeDurationsAreOk() {
    Duration threeHundredYears = Duration.ofDays(365 * 300);
    CacheBuilder<Object, Object> unused =
        CacheBuilder.newBuilder()