}

        @Override
        public boolean refresh() {
            // MSAL4J handles token refresh internally through silent authentication
            // Check if token is still valid by comparing absolute timestamps
            final long tokenExpiryTime = authResult.expiresOnDate().getTime(); // milliseconds since epoch

            assertNotNull("Resource should exist", is);
            contentNew = new String(is.readAllBytes(), StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
        }

        // Verify content is valid JSON
        assertTrue("Content should start with {", contentNew.trim().startsWith("{"));
        assertTrue("Content should end with }", contentNew.trim().endsWith("}"));

func (ct TableType) Type() string {
	return ct.TypeValue
}

// Comment returns the comment of current table.
func (ct TableType) Comment() (comment string, ok bool) {
	return ct.CommentValue.String, ct.CommentValue.Valid

 - CallStart 
 - **CacheMiss**
 - ProxySelectStart
 - ... Standard Events ...
 - CallEnd
        
### Conditional Cache Hit
 
When cache flags require checking the cache results are still valid an early cacheConditionalHit event is
received followed by a cache hit or miss.  Critically in the cache hit scenario the server won’t send the response body.

- Invalid archive handling
- Empty archive handling
- Mixed valid/invalid entries

**Covered Extractors**:
- ZipExtractor
- TarExtractor

**Test Count**: 12 tests

**Key Scenarios**:
- ✅ Descriptive error messages for invalid archives
- ✅ Continues processing when some entries fail
- ✅ Handles empty archives gracefully
- ✅ Mixed valid/invalid entries processed correctly
- ✅ Null input stream validation

---

			nil,
			nil,
		},
		// Test - 4 - parse the chunk reader properly.
		{
			bufio.NewReader(readers[3]),
			nil,
			[]byte("1000"),
			[]byte("111123333333333333334444211"),
		},
	}
	// Valid test cases for each chunk line.
	for i, tt := range testCases {
		chunkSize, chunkSignature, err := readChunkLine(tt.reader)
		if err != tt.expectedErr {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: Expected %s, got %s", i+1, tt.expectedErr, err)

                "input": {"age": "five"},
            },
            {
                "type": "decimal_parsing",
                "loc": ["body", 0, "age"],
                "msg": "Input should be a valid decimal",
                "input": "five",
            },
            {
                "type": "missing",
                "loc": ["body", 1, "name"],
                "msg": "Field required",

   *
   * @param bytes byte array representing an IPv4 address (should be of length 4)
   * @return {@link Inet4Address} corresponding to the supplied byte array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if a valid {@link Inet4Address} can not be created
   */
  private static Inet4Address getInet4Address(byte[] bytes) {
    checkArgument(
        bytes.length == 4,

      Key key1 = new Key(1);
      String value1 = key1.toString();
      Key key2 = new Key(2);
      String value2 = key2.toString();
      assertThat(cache.getUnchecked(key1)).isSameInstanceAs(value1);
      assertThat(cache.getUnchecked(key2)).isSameInstanceAs(value2);
      assertThat(cache.asMap().keySet()).isEqualTo(ImmutableSet.of(key1, key2));
      assertThat(cache.asMap().values()).containsExactly(value1, value2);

    return set(re.findall("{(.*?)}", path))


_invalid_args_message = (
    "Invalid args for response field! Hint: "
    "check that {type_} is a valid Pydantic field type. "
    "If you are using a return type annotation that is not a valid Pydantic "
    "field (e.g. Union[Response, dict, None]) you can disable generating the "
    "response model from the type annotation with the path operation decorator "