*       tasks -- even tasks that are not themselves {@code directExecutor} tasks.
   *   <li>If many such tasks are chained together (such as with {@code
   *       future.transform(...).transform(...).transform(...)....}), they may overflow the stack.
   *       (In simple cases, callers can avoid this by registering all tasks with the same {@link
   *       MoreExecutors#newSequentialExecutor} wrapper around {@code directExecutor()}. More

n=this._element.scrollHeight>document.documentElement.clientHeight;n||(this._element.style.overflowY="hidden"),this._element.classList.add(ht);var i=d.getTransitionDurationFromElement(this._dialog);o.default(this._element).off(d.TRANSITION_END),o.default(this._element).one(d.TRANSITION_END,(function(){t._element.classList.remove(ht),n||o.default(t._element).one(d.TRANSITION_END,(function(){t._element.style.overflowY=""})).emulateTransitionEnd(t._element,i)})).emulateTransitionEnd(i),this._element.foc...

    i = 1 << 30;
    assertFalse(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(i - 2));
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(i - 1));
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(i));

    // 1 << 31 is negative because of overflow, 1 << 31 - 1 is positive
    // since isEvenLevel adds 1, we need to do - 2.
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel((1 << 31) - 2));
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1));

      /*
       * It speeds things up considerably to unconditionally add count to totalCount here,
       * but that destroys failure atomicity in the case of count overflow. =(
       */
      int cmp = comparator.compare(e, getElement());
      if (cmp < 0) {
        AvlNode<E> initLeft = left;
        if (initLeft == null) {
          result[0] = 0;

  }

  /** Returns a -1 if unable to parse */
  private static int tryParseDecimal(String string, int start, int end) {
    int decimal = 0;
    final int max = Integer.MAX_VALUE / 10; // for int overflow detection
    for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
      if (decimal > max) {
        return -1;
      }
      decimal *= 10;
      int digit = Character.digit(string.charAt(i), 10);
      if (digit < 0) {

      /*
       * It speeds things up considerably to unconditionally add count to totalCount here,
       * but that destroys failure atomicity in the case of count overflow. =(
       */
      int cmp = comparator.compare(e, getElement());
      if (cmp < 0) {
        AvlNode<E> initLeft = left;
        if (initLeft == null) {
          result[0] = 0;

  }

  /** There's no reason for the queueSize to ever be more than maxSize + 1 */
  private static int capAtMaximumSize(int queueSize, int maximumSize) {
    return min(queueSize - 1, maximumSize) + 1; // don't overflow
  }

rrentTime","startTime","tweens","opts","specialEasing","originalProperties","originalOptions","gotoEnd","propFilter","bind","complete","timer","anim","*","tweener","oldfire","propTween","restoreDisplay","isBox","dataShow","unqueued","overflow","overflowX","overflowY","prefilter","speed","speeds","fadeTo","to","animate","optall","doAnimation","finish","stopQueue","timers","cssFn","slideDown","slideUp","slideToggle","fadeIn","fadeOut","fadeToggle","slow","fast","delay","time","timeout","clearTimeo...

      setFutureSuccess.set(false);
      cancellationSuccess.set(false);
      finalResults.clear();
    }
    executor.shutdown();
  }

  // In a previous implementation this would cause a stack overflow after ~2000 futures chained
  // together.  Now it should only be limited by available memory (and time)
  public void testSetFuture_stackOverflow() {
    SettableFuture<String> orig = SettableFuture.create();

            if ( resp.getCommand() == ServerMessageBlock.SMB_COM_READ_ANDX
                    && ( errorCode == 0 || errorCode == NtStatus.NT_STATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW ) ) {
                // overflow indicator normal for pipe
                SmbComReadAndXResponse r = (SmbComReadAndXResponse) resp;
                int off = SMB1_HEADER_LENGTH;
                /* WordCount thru dataOffset always 27 */