/**
   * True if this task faker has ever had multiple tasks scheduled to run concurrently. Guarded by
   * `this`.
   */
  var isParallel = false

  /** Number of calls to [TaskRunner.Backend.execute]. Guarded by `this`. */
  var executeCallCount = 0

  /** Guarded by [taskRunner]. */
  var nanoTime = 0L
    private set

     * blocking on the load. Multiple concurrent calls to {@link Cache} lookup methods with the same
     * key on an absent value should result in a single call to either {@code recordLoadSuccess} or
     * {@code recordLoadException} and multiple calls to this method, despite all being served by
     * the results of a single load operation.
     *

 * <p>This class is GWT-compatible.
 *
 * <h3>Purpose</h3>
 *
 * <p>The main purpose of {@code ListenableFuture} is to help you chain together a graph of
 * asynchronous operations. You can chain them together manually with calls to methods like {@link
 * Futures#transform(ListenableFuture, com.google.common.base.Function, Executor) Futures.transform}
 * (or {@link FluentFuture#transform(com.google.common.base.Function, Executor)

 * <p>This class is GWT-compatible.
 *
 * <h3>Purpose</h3>
 *
 * <p>The main purpose of {@code ListenableFuture} is to help you chain together a graph of
 * asynchronous operations. You can chain them together manually with calls to methods like {@link
 * Futures#transform(ListenableFuture, com.google.common.base.Function, Executor) Futures.transform}
 * (or {@link FluentFuture#transform(com.google.common.base.Function, Executor)

 *
 * <p>There are three Win32 function calls provided by the Windows SDK
 * that are important in the context of using jCIFS. They are:
 *
 * <ul>
 * <li> <code>CallNamedPipe</code> A message-type pipe call that opens,
 *      writes to, reads from, and closes the pipe in a single operation.
 * <li> <code>TransactNamedPipe</code> A message-type pipe call that

          }
        }

        @Override
        public void remove() {
          if (toRemove == null) {
            throw new IllegalStateException("no calls to next() since the last call to remove()");
          }
          forward().remove(toRemove.getKey());
          toRemove = null;
        }
      };
    }
  }

  @Override

          }
        }

        @Override
        public void remove() {
          if (toRemove == null) {
            throw new IllegalStateException("no calls to next() since the last call to remove()");
          }
          forward().remove(toRemove.getKey());
          toRemove = null;
        }
      };
    }
  }

  @Override

   *     ({@code ArrayList} documentation calls this value the "capacity")
   * @return a new, empty {@code ArrayList} which is guaranteed not to resize itself unless its size
   *     reaches {@code initialArraySize + 1}
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code initialArraySize} is negative
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("NonApiType") // acts as a direct substitute for a constructor call

    }

    /*
     * We need to be able to mock identityHashCode() calls for tests, because it
     * can take 1-10 seconds to find colliding objects. Mocking frameworks that
     * can do magic to mock static method calls still can't do so for a system
     * class, so we need the indirection. In production, Hotspot should still
     * recognize that the call is 1-morphic and should still be willing to
     * inline it if necessary.

     * blocking on the load. Multiple concurrent calls to {@link Cache} lookup methods with the same
     * key on an absent value should result in a single call to either {@code recordLoadSuccess} or
     * {@code recordLoadException} and multiple calls to this method, despite all being served by
     * the results of a single load operation.
     *