<img src="/img/tutorial/bigger-applications/image01.png">

## Include the same router multiple times with different `prefix` { #include-the-same-router-multiple-times-with-different-prefix }

You can also use `.include_router()` multiple times with the *same* router using different prefixes.

.select2-selection__arrow {\n  top: -.12rem;\n}\n\n.text-sm .select2-container--default .select2-selection--multiple,\nselect.form-control-sm ~ .select2-container--default .select2-selection--multiple {\n  min-height: calc(1.8125rem + 2px);\n}\n\n.text-sm .select2-container--default .select2-selection--multiple .select2-selection__rendered,\nselect.form-control-sm ~ .select2-container--default .select2-selection--multiple .select2-selection__rendered {\n  padding: 0 0.25rem 0.25rem;\n  margin-top: -0.1rem;\n}\n\n.text-sm...

## Dependencies for a group of *path operations* { #dependencies-for-a-group-of-path-operations }

Later, when reading about how to structure bigger applications ([Bigger Applications - Multiple Files](../../tutorial/bigger-applications.md){.internal-link target=_blank}), possibly with multiple files, you will learn how to declare a single `dependencies` parameter for a group of *path operations*.

## Global Dependencies { #global-dependencies }

		// 'proto=' which should precede right after `for=` if not
		// we simply ignore the values and return empty. This is in line
		// with the approach we took for returning first ip from multiple
		// params.
		if match := forRegex.FindStringSubmatch(proto); len(match) > 1 {
			if match = protoRegex.FindStringSubmatch(match[2]); len(match) > 1 {
				scheme = strings.ToLower(match[2])
			}
		}
	}

            assertNull(response.getExpiration());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle multiple configurations")
        void testMultipleConfigurations() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            // Given - create multiple configurations
            Configuration config1 = mock(Configuration.class);
            Configuration config2 = mock(Configuration.class);

        assertFalse(Arrays.equals(retrieved1, retrieved2), "Keys should be different");
    }

    @Test
    public void testClearAllKeys() {
        // Store multiple keys
        for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
            byte[] key = new byte[16];
            new SecureRandom().nextBytes(key);
            keyManager.storeSessionKey("session-" + i, key, "AES");
        }

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should handle multiple close() calls gracefully")
    void testMultipleCloseCallsSafe() {
        // Given
        Smb2EncryptionContext closeableContext = new Smb2EncryptionContext(EncryptionNegotiateContext.CIPHER_AES128_CCM,
                DialectVersion.SMB302, testEncryptionKey, testDecryptionKey);

        // When/Then - Multiple close calls should not throw
        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> {

.select2-selection--multiple .select2-search.select2-search--inline .select2-search__field{margin-top:8px}.select2-container--default .select2-selection--multiple.text-sm .select2-selection__choice,.text-sm .select2-container--default .select2-selection--multiple .select2-selection__choice{margin-top:.4rem}.select2-container--default.select2-container--focus .select2-selection--multiple,.select2-container--default.select2-container--focus .select2-selection--single{border-color:#80bdff}.select2-container--de...

## Why is Erasure Code useful?

#
# Windows users contributing to Go will need to use a modern version
# of git and editors capable of LF line endings.
#
# Windows .bat files are known to have multiple bugs when run with LF
# endings, and so they are checked in with CRLF endings, with a test
# in test/winbatch.go to catch problems. (See golang.org/issue/37791.)
#