public void testOffer_nullUnsupported() {
    assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> getQueue().offer(null));
    expectUnchanged();
    expectNullMissingWhenNullUnsupported("Should not contain null after unsupported offer(null)");
  }

	if v != "val1" {
		t.Fatalf("value differs from expected")
	}
	if !ok {
		t.Fatalf("should be true")
	}

	if !lc.Contains("key1") {
		t.Fatalf("should contain key1")
	}
	if lc.Contains("key2") {
		t.Fatalf("should not contain key2")
	}

	v, ok = lc.Peek("key2")
	if v != "" {
		t.Fatalf("should be empty")
	}
	if ok {
		t.Fatalf("should be false")
	}

   * null} even for a map which supposedly does not contain null elements, if the key is not present
   * when {@code getValue()} is called.
   */
  final class EntryForKey extends AbstractMapEntry<K, V> {
    @ParametricNullness final K key;
    int index;

    EntryForKey(int index) {
      // The cast is safe because we call forEntry only for indexes that contain entries.
      this.key = uncheckedCastNullableTToT(keys[index]);

  }

  /**
   * Returns an {@code UnsignedInteger} holding the value of the specified {@code String}, parsed as
   * an unsigned {@code int} value.
   *
   * @throws NumberFormatException if the string does not contain a parsable unsigned {@code int}
   *     value
   */
  public static UnsignedInteger valueOf(String string) {
    return valueOf(string, 10);
  }

  /**

            49, 51, 59, 163, 199, 321, 325, 363, 367, 469, 545, 561, 727, 769, 773, 781);
    for (int i = 1; i < 900; i += 2) {
      if (!falsePositives.contains(i)) {
        assertFalse("BF should not contain " + i, bf.mightContain(Integer.toString(i)));
      }
    }

    // Check that there are exactly 29824 false positives for this BF.
    int knownNumberOfFalsePositives = 29824;
    int numFpp = 0;

     * lu/GJQZoU9lDrCPeUcQ28tzOWw==
     * -----END PRIVATE KEY-----
     * ```
     *
     * The string should contain exactly one certificate and one private key in [PKCS #8][rfc_5208]
     * format. It should not contain any other PEM-encoded blocks, but it may contain other text
     * which will be ignored.
     *
     * Encode a held certificate into this format by concatenating the results of

   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> use {@link Long#parseUnsignedLong(String)} instead.
   *
   * @throws NumberFormatException if the string does not contain a valid unsigned {@code long}
   *     value
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code string} is null (in contrast to {@link
   *     Long#parseLong(String)})
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

    this.loggerName = ownerOfLogger.getName();
  }

  Logger get() {
    /*
     * We use double-checked locking. We could the try racy single-check idiom, but that would
     * depend on Logger to not contain mutable state.
     *
     * We could use Suppliers.memoizingSupplier here, but I micro-optimized to this implementation
     * to avoid the extra class for the lambda (and maybe more for memoizingSupplier itself) and the

  public void testAddAtIndex_nullUnsupported() {
    assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> getList().add(0, null));
    expectUnchanged();
    expectNullMissingWhenNullUnsupported("Should not contain null after unsupported add(n, null)");
  }

  @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX)
  public void testAddAtIndex_negative() {
    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> getList().add(-1, e3()));

    assertTrue(
        "removeAll(intersectingCollection) should return true",
        getList().removeAll(MinimalCollection.of(duplicate)));
    assertFalse(
        "after removeAll(e), a collection should not contain e even "
            + "if it initially contained e more than once.",
        getList().contains(duplicate));
  }

  // All other cases are covered by CollectionRemoveAllTester.