config.QueueList = append(config.QueueList[:i],
						config.QueueList[i+1:]...)
				}
				// This is a one time activity we shall do this
				// here and allow stale ARN to be removed. We shall
				// never reach a stage where we will have stale
				// notification configs.
			}
		} else {
			writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, toAPIError(ctx, err), r.URL)
			return
		}
	}

	configData, err := xml.Marshal(config)

    FastAPI 🛠️, ↕ 🎭, ⏩ 💡, ⏩ 📟, 🔜 🏭
</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster" target="_blank">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/workflows/Test/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/redirect/fastapi/fastapi" target="_blank">

</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster" target="_blank">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/workflows/Test/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://codecov.io/gh/fastapi/fastapi" target="_blank">

        assertThrows(
            TimeoutException.class, () -> service.startAsync().awaitRunning(1, MILLISECONDS));
    assertThat(e)
        .hasMessageThat()
        .isEqualTo("Timed out waiting for Foo [STARTING] to reach the RUNNING state.");
  }

  private static class TestService extends AbstractIdleService {
    int startUpCalled = 0;
    int shutDownCalled = 0;
    final List<State> transitionStates = Lists.newArrayList();

### Verify auto-encryption

> Note that auto-encryption only affects requests without S3 encryption headers. So, if a S3 client sends
> e.g. SSE-C headers, MinIO will encrypt the object with the key sent by the client and won't reach out to
> the configured KMS.

To verify auto-encryption, use the following `mc` command:

```
mc cp test.file myminio/bucket/

</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster" target="_blank">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/workflows/Test/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://codecov.io/gh/fastapi/fastapi" target="_blank">

</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster" target="_blank">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/workflows/Test/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/redirect/fastapi/fastapi" target="_blank">

      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

  @Override
  public final void awaitTerminated() {
    monitor.enterWhenUninterruptibly(isStopped);
    try {
      checkCurrentState(TERMINATED);
    } finally {

</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster" target="_blank">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/workflows/Test/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/redirect/fastapi/fastapi" target="_blank">

   * than CPUs, supposing that each thread were bound to a CPU,
   * there would exist a perfect hash function mapping threads to
   * slots that eliminates collisions. When we reach capacity, we
   * search for this mapping by randomly varying the hash codes of
   * colliding threads.  Because search is random, and collisions
   * only become known via CAS failures, convergence can be slow,