val sslSocket =
      object : DelegatingSSLSocket(context.socketFactory.createSocket() as SSLSocket) {}
    assertFalse(adapter.matchesSocket(sslSocket))

    adapter.configureTlsExtensions(sslSocket, null, listOf(HTTP_2, HTTP_1_1))
    // not connected
    assertNull(adapter.getSelectedProtocol(sslSocket))
  }

  companion object {
    @JvmStatic
    fun data(): Collection<SocketAdapter> {

        "components": {
            "schemas": {
                "ValidationError": {
                    "title": "ValidationError",
                    "required": ["loc", "msg", "type"],
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "loc": {
                            "title": "Location",
                            "type": "array",
                            "items": {

        "components": {
            "schemas": {
                "ValidationError": {
                    "title": "ValidationError",
                    "required": ["loc", "msg", "type"],
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "loc": {
                            "title": "Location",
                            "type": "array",
                            "items": {

  //             System.runFinalization();
  //         }
  //         System.exit(0);
  //     }

  //     public static TestSuite newTestSuite(Object... suiteOrClasses) {
  //         TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
  //         for (Object suiteOrClass : suiteOrClasses) {
  //             if (suiteOrClass instanceof TestSuite)
  //                 suite.addTest((TestSuite) suiteOrClass);

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "x": {"title": "X", "type": "number"},
                        "y": {"title": "Y", "type": "number"},
                    },
                },
                "HTTPValidationError": {
                    "title": "HTTPValidationError",
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {

| ----------|-------------|----------------------------------------
| xlHeader  | [4]byte     | `'X', 'L', '2', ' '`
| xlVersion | [4]byte     | `'1', ' ', ' ', ' '`
| xlMetaV2  | msgp object | All versions as single messagepack object
| [EOF] | |

### v1.1+

Version 1.1 added inline data, which will be placed after the metadata.

Therefore, the metadata is wrapped as a binary array for easy skipping.

    // it still should only have executed twice due to memoization
    assertEquals(2, countingSupplier.calls);
  }

  public void testOfInstanceSuppliesSameInstance() {
    Object toBeSupplied = new Object();
    Supplier<Object> objectSupplier = Suppliers.ofInstance(toBeSupplied);
    assertSame(toBeSupplied, objectSupplier.get());
    assertSame(toBeSupplied, objectSupplier.get()); // idempotent
  }

    // it still should only have executed twice due to memoization
    assertEquals(2, countingSupplier.calls);
  }

  public void testOfInstanceSuppliesSameInstance() {
    Object toBeSupplied = new Object();
    Supplier<Object> objectSupplier = Suppliers.ofInstance(toBeSupplied);
    assertSame(toBeSupplied, objectSupplier.get());
    assertSame(toBeSupplied, objectSupplier.get()); // idempotent
  }