*/
@FunctionalInterface
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public interface TearDown {
  /**
   * Performs a <b>single</b> tear-down operation. See test-libraries-for-java's {@code
   * com.google.common.testing.junit3.TearDownTestCase} and {@code
   * com.google.common.testing.junit4.TearDownTestCase} for example.
   *
   * <p>A failing {@link TearDown} may or may not fail a tl4j test, depending on the version of

 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,
 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.core.exception;

import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.instanceOf;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.is;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.notNullValue;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;

     * @param context The environmental context used to determine the activation status of a profile, must not be
     *            {@code null}.
     * @param problems The container used to collect problems that were encountered, must not be {@code null}.
     * @return The profiles that have been activated, never {@code null}.
     */
    List<Profile> getActiveProfiles(

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.io;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
import static com.google.common.collect.Iterables.getOnlyElement;
import static java.nio.file.LinkOption.NOFOLLOW_LINKS;
import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;

Hay algunos casos en los que podrías necesitar modificar el esquema de OpenAPI generado.

En esta sección verás cómo hacerlo.

## El proceso normal { #the-normal-process }

El proceso normal (por defecto) es el siguiente.

Una aplicación (instance) de `FastAPI` tiene un método `.openapi()` que se espera que devuelva el esquema de OpenAPI.

* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like Markdown can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

Específicamente, ver Uvicorn, Starlette y FastAPI comparados juntos (entre muchas otras herramientas).

Cuanto más simple sea el problema resuelto por la herramienta, mejor rendimiento tendrá. Y la mayoría de los benchmarks no prueban las funcionalidades adicionales proporcionadas por la herramienta.

La jerarquía es como:

* **Uvicorn**: un servidor ASGI

  }

  /**
   * Map generator that verifies that {@code setUp()} methods are called in all the test cases. The
   * {@code setUpRan} parameter is set true by the {@code setUp} that every test case is supposed to
   * have registered, and set false by the {@code tearDown}. We use a dynamic proxy to intercept all
   * of the {@code Map} method calls and check that {@code setUpRan} is true.
   */

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.CanIgnoreReturnValue;
import java.util.concurrent.CancellationException;

 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingQueue} forward <b>indiscriminately</b> to the
 * methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #add} alone <b>will not</b> change the
 * behavior of {@link #offer} which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should
 * override {@code offer} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the
 * provided {@code standardOffer} method.
 *