<span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> tip </font></span>  Running in development mode, for production use:
             <b>fastapi run</b>

             Logs:

  (*config.mutable_device_count())["CPU"] = num_cpu_devices;

  // TODO(b/113217601): This is needed for EagerContext::runner_ to use a
  // threadpool, so that we avoid the possibility of running the runner_ in the
  // threadpool of GPU event mgr, as that can trigger more callbacks to be
  // scheduled on that same threadpool, causing a deadlock in cases where the

      <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> tip </font></span>  Running in development mode, for production use:
             <b>fastapi run</b>

             Logs:

     <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> INFO </font></span>  Application startup complete.
     <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> INFO </font></span>  Uvicorn running on <font color="#729FCF"><u style="text-decoration-style:solid">http://0.0.0.0:8000</u></font> <b>(</b>Press CTRL+C
             to quit<b>)</b>
```

</div>

Isto deve funcionar para a maioria dos casos. 😎

             Logs:

     <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> INFO </font></span>  Uvicorn running on <font color="#729FCF"><u style="text-decoration-style:solid">http://0.0.0.0:8000</u></font> <b>(</b>Press CTRL+C to
             quit<b>)</b>

   * com.google.common.testing.junit4.TearDownTestCase} for example.
   *
   * <p>A failing {@link TearDown} may or may not fail a tl4j test, depending on the version of
   * JUnit test case you are running under. To avoid failing in the face of an exception regardless
   * of JUnit version, implement a {@link SloppyTearDown} instead.
   *
   * <p>tl4j details: For backwards compatibility, {@code junit3.TearDownTestCase} currently does

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

          }
          // Log it and keep going.
          logger
              .get()
              .log(
                  Level.SEVERE,
                  "Exception while running callbacks for " + listener + " on " + executor,
                  e);
          throw e;
        }
      }
    }

    @Override
    @SuppressWarnings("CatchingUnchecked") // sneaky checked exception

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

Sensitive security-related issues should be reported to [******@****.***](mailto:******@****.***).
See the [security policy](https://golang.org/security) for details.

The recommended way to file an issue is by running `go bug`.
Otherwise, when filing an issue, make sure to answer these five questions:

1. What version of Go are you using (`go version`)?
2. What operating system and processor architecture are you using?
3. What did you do?