<mime-type type="application/vnd.oma.poc.detailed-progress-report+xml"/>
  <mime-type type="application/vnd.oma.poc.final-report+xml"/>
  <mime-type type="application/vnd.oma.poc.groups+xml"/>
  <mime-type type="application/vnd.oma.poc.invocation-descriptor+xml"/>
  <mime-type type="application/vnd.oma.poc.optimized-progress-report+xml"/>
  <mime-type type="application/vnd.oma.xcap-directory+xml"/>

                "virtualHosts");
    }

    @Override
    public PropertyGateway findPropertyGateway(final String prop) {
        return doFindEpg(_epgMap, prop);
    }

    // ===================================================================================
    //                                                                          Table Info

- **i18n**: All user-facing strings in `fess_label_*.properties`
- **Default Port**: 8080 (configurable via `fess.port` system property)
- **Log Location**: `target/fess-logs/` (dev), `/var/log/fess/` (prod)
- **Admin Login**: `admin/admin`

## Log Message Guidelines

- Format parameters as `key=value` (e.g., `sessionId={}`, `url={}`)
- Prefix with `[name]` when context identification is needed

        .build()

    // An example test URL that returns client certificate details.
    val request =
      Request
        .Builder()
        .url("https://prod.idrix.eu/secure/")
        .build()

    client.newCall(request).execute().use { response ->
      if (!response.isSuccessful) throw IOException("Unexpected code $response")

      println(response.body.string())
    }

### Ein Prozess pro Container { #one-process-per-container }

In einem solchen Szenario möchten Sie wahrscheinlich **einen einzelnen (Uvicorn-)Prozess pro Container** haben, da Sie die Replikation bereits auf Cluster-Ebene durchführen würden.

     *
     * @param prop comma-separated list of operations to disallow in compound requests
     */
    protected void initDisallowCompound(final String prop) {
        if (prop == null) {
            return;
        }
        final Set<String> disallow = new HashSet<>();
        final StringTokenizer st = new StringTokenizer(prop, ",");
        while (st.hasMoreTokens()) {

import assertk.assertions.isInstanceOf
import assertk.assertions.isNotEmpty
import assertk.assertions.isNotNull
import assertk.assertions.isNull
import assertk.assertions.isSameAs
import assertk.assertions.prop
import java.io.File
import java.io.IOException
import java.io.InterruptedIOException
import java.net.HttpURLConnection
import java.net.InetAddress
import java.net.InetSocketAddress
import java.net.Proxy

* `/users/{user_id}/activate`
* `/items/pro/`

开发人员可以使用依赖项及其子依赖项为这些路径操作添加不同的权限：

```mermaid
graph TB

current_user(["current_user"])
active_user(["active_user"])
admin_user(["admin_user"])
paying_user(["paying_user"])

public["/items/public/"]
private["/items/private/"]
activate_user["/users/{user_id}/activate"]
pro_items["/items/pro/"]

current_user --> active_user

Por exemplo, vamos supor que você possua 4 endpoints na sua API (*operações de rota*):

* `/items/public/`
* `/items/private/`
* `/users/{user_id}/activate`
* `/items/pro/`

Você poderia adicionar diferentes requisitos de permissão para cada um deles utilizando apenas dependências e sub-dependências:

```mermaid
graph TB

current_user(["current_user"])

	}
	if err := DB.AutoMigrate(&CompositeKeyProduct{}); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("failed to migrate, got error %v", err)
	}

	prod := &CompositeKeyProduct{
		LanguageCode: 56,
		Code:         "Code56",
		Name:         "ProductName56",
	}
	if err := DB.Create(&prod).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("failed to create, got error %v", err)
	}

	newProd := &CompositeKeyProduct{}