// Response should be created with the same config from context
            verify(mockContext, times(1)).getConfig();
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should pass output buffer to response")
        void testCreateResponseWithBuffer() {
            byte[] specificBuffer = new byte[2048];
            int offset = 128;

    /**
     * Gets an array of rescorer builders for post-processing search results.
     * This method evaluates all configured query rescorers with the provided parameters.
     *
     * @param params parameters to pass to the rescorers during evaluation
     * @return an array of rescorer builders, filtered to exclude null values
     */
    public RescorerBuilder<?>[] getRescorers(final Map<String, Object> params) {

  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {

   * single-threaded.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // GWT is single threaded
  public void testCopyOf_threadSafe() {
    /*
     * The actual collections that we pass as inputs will be wrappers around these, so
     * ImmutableSet.copyOf won't short-circuit because it won't see an ImmutableSet input.
     */
    ImmutableList<ImmutableSet<String>> distinctCandidatesByAscendingSize =

       * all inputs for exceptions *if* we're collecting values. If we're not, then the listener
       * doesn't need access to the futures again, so we can just pass `null`.
       *
       * TODO(b/112550045): Allocating a single, cheaper listener is (I think) only an optimization.
       * If we make some other optimizations, this one will no longer be necessary. The optimization

    TrustedListenableFutureTask<O> task = TrustedListenableFutureTask.create(callable);
    Future<?> scheduled = executorService.schedule(task, delay, timeUnit);
    /*
     * Even when the user interrupts the task, we pass `false` to `cancel` so that we don't
     * interrupt a second time after the interruption performed by TrustedListenableFutureTask.
     */
    task.addListener(() -> scheduled.cancel(false), directExecutor());

     * 1) An interface I extending Comparable<I> so that the created array is of
     * an interface type. 2) An instance of a class implementing that interface
     * so that we can pass non-null instances of the interface.
     *
     * (Currently it's safe to pass instances for which compareTo() always
     * returns 0, but if we had a SingletonImmutableSortedSet, this might no
     * longer be the case.)
     *

 * {@code Comparable} type; for example, "integers from 1 to 100 inclusive." Note that it is not
 * possible to <i>iterate</i> over these contained values. To do so, pass this range instance and an
 * appropriate {@link DiscreteDomain} to {@link ContiguousSet#create}.
 *
 * <h3>Types of ranges</h3>
 *
 * <p>Each end of the range may be bounded or unbounded. If bounded, there is an associated

   * if occurrences == 0. This satisfies both NullPointerTester and
   * CollectionRemoveTester.testRemove_nullAllowed, but it's not clear that it's
   * a good policy, especially because, in order for the test to pass, the
   * parameter must be misleadingly annotated as @Nullable. I suspect that
   * we'll want to remove @Nullable, add an eager checkNotNull, and loosen up
   * testRemove_nullAllowed.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {