* someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, graph);
 * }
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code PredecessorsFunction}. It will also work
 * with any other implementation of this interface.
 *
 * <p>If you have your own graph implementation based around a custom node type {@code MyNode},
 * which has a method {@code getParents()} that retrieves its predecessors in a graph:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, MyNode::getParents);

 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, graph);
 * }
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code SuccessorsFunction}. It will also work with
 * any other implementation of this interface.
 *
 * <p>If you have your own graph implementation based around a custom node type {@code MyNode},
 * which has a method {@code getChildren()} that retrieves its successors in a graph:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, MyNode::getChildren);

 * change the behavior of {@link #equals}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you
 * should override {@code equals} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating
 * to the provided {@code standardEquals} method.
 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods, where appropriate, use {@link Objects#equals} to test

 * loading), and fewer <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Apackage%3Dcache+label%3Atype%3Ddefect">bugs</a>.
 *
 * <p>Caffeine defines its own interfaces (<a
 * href="https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.github.ben-manes.caffeine/caffeine/latest/com.github.benmanes.caffeine/com/github/benmanes/caffeine/cache/Cache.html">{@code
 * Cache}</a>, <a

 * behavior of {@link #addAll}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should
 * override {@code addAll} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the
 * provided {@code standardAddAll} method.
 *
 * <p><b>{@code default} method warning:</b> This class does <i>not</i> forward calls to {@code

///

## Forbid Extra Cookies { #forbid-extra-cookies }

In some special use cases (probably not very common), you might want to **restrict** the cookies that you want to receive.

Your API now has the power to control its own <abbr title="This is a joke, just in case. It has nothing to do with cookie consents, but it's funny that even the API can now reject the poor cookies. Have a cookie. 🍪">cookie consent</abbr>. 🤪🍪

    assertNull(getMap().get(k1()));
    assertEquals(k1(), getMap().inverse().get(null));
    assertEquals(1, getMap().size());
  }

  // nb: inverse is run through its own entire suite

  @MapFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_PUT)
  @CollectionSize.Require(ZERO)
  public void testInversePut() {
    getMap().put(k0(), v0());
    getMap().inverse().put(v1(), k1());

Google permission to use and redistribute your contributions as part of the
project.

  - If you are an individual writing original source code and you're sure you
    own the intellectual property, then you'll need to sign an [individual
    CLA][]. Please include your GitHub username.
  - If you work for a company that wants to allow you to contribute your work,

 * the behaviour of {@link #offer} which can lead to unexpected behaviour. In this case, you should
 * override {@code offer} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the
 * provided {@code standardOffer} method.
 *
 * <p><b>{@code default} method warning:</b> This class does <i>not</i> forward calls to {@code

 * not</b> change the behavior of {@link #add(Object)}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In
 * this case, you should override {@code add(Object)} as well, either providing your own
 * implementation, or delegating to the provided {@code standardAdd} method.
 *
 * <p><b>{@code default} method warning:</b> This class does <i>not</i> forward calls to {@code