"X-Minio-Internal-Encrypted-Multipart":                   "X-Minio-Replication-Encrypted-Multipart",
	"X-Minio-Internal-Actual-Object-Size":                    "X-Minio-Replication-Actual-Object-Size",
	// Add more supported headers here.
}

// mapping of replication headers to internal headers
var replicationToInternalHeaders = map[string]string{

# Test Client - `TestClient`

You can use the `TestClient` class to test FastAPI applications without creating an actual HTTP and socket connection, just communicating directly with the FastAPI code.

Read more about it in the [FastAPI docs for Testing](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/testing/).

You can import it directly from `fastapi.testclient`:

```python
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
```

    /**
     * Returns the session key.
     *
     * This is the encrypted session key included in the message,
     * if the actual session key is desired use {@link #getMasterKey()} instead.
     *
     * @return A <code>byte[]</code> containing the encrypted session key.
     */
    public byte[] getEncryptedSessionKey() {
        return this.sessionKey;
    }

    /**
     * Sets the session key.
     *

 * @since 16.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public abstract class MultimapBuilder<K0 extends @Nullable Object, V0 extends @Nullable Object> {
  /*
   * Leaving K and V as upper bounds rather than the actual key and value types allows type
   * parameters to be left implicit more often. CacheBuilder uses the same technique.
   */

  private MultimapBuilder() {}

  private static final int DEFAULT_EXPECTED_KEYS = 8;

 * @since 16.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public abstract class MultimapBuilder<K0 extends @Nullable Object, V0 extends @Nullable Object> {
  /*
   * Leaving K and V as upper bounds rather than the actual key and value types allows type
   * parameters to be left implicit more often. CacheBuilder uses the same technique.
   */

  private MultimapBuilder() {}

  private static final int DEFAULT_EXPECTED_KEYS = 8;

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the

	md5hex := getMD5Hash(textData)
	sha256hex := ""

	// benchmark utility which helps obtain number of allocations and bytes allocated per ops.
	b.ReportAllocs()
	// the actual benchmark for PutObject starts here. Reset the benchmark timer.

	for i := 0; b.Loop(); i++ {
		// insert the object.
		objInfo, err := obj.PutObject(b.Context(), bucket, "object"+strconv.Itoa(i),

        try {
            String[] languages = searchHelper.getLanguages(getMockRequest(), params);

            assertNotNull(languages);
            if (languages.length > 0) {
                // Note: The actual order might be different due to normalization
                boolean hasEn = false, hasJa = false;
                for (String lang : languages) {
                    if ("en".equals(lang))

     */
    @Test
    public void testEncryptionContextPerformance() throws Exception {
        // Create mock encryption context for testing (simplified)
        // Note: This tests the atomic operations without actual encryption

        int threadCount = 8;
        int operationsPerThread = 500;
        ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threadCount);
        CountDownLatch startLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);

            if (nameParts.length > pos) {
                this.share = nameParts[pos];
                pos++;
            }

            // all other remaining path elements are actual path
            if (nameParts.length > pos) {
                final String[] remainParts = new String[nameParts.length - pos];
                System.arraycopy(nameParts, pos, remainParts, 0, nameParts.length - pos);