},
                        },
                    },
                },
            },
            "/users/": {
                "get": {
                    "tags": ["users"],
                    "summary": "Read Users",
                    "operationId": "read_users_users__get",
                    "responses": {
                        "200": {

   * uninterruptibly.
   *
   * @since 33.4.0 (but since 28.0 in the JRE flavor)
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // concurrency
  @IgnoreJRERequirement // Users will use this only if they're already using Duration.
  public static boolean awaitUninterruptibly(CountDownLatch latch, Duration timeout) {
    return awaitUninterruptibly(latch, toNanosSaturated(timeout), TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
  }

            "summary": "Deadpool's favorite app. Nuff said.",
            "description": "\nChimichangApp API helps you do awesome stuff. 🚀\n\n## Items\n\nYou can **read items**.\n\n## Users\n\nYou will be able to:\n\n* **Create users** (_not implemented_).\n* **Read users** (_not implemented_).\n",
            "termsOfService": "http://example.com/terms/",
            "contact": {
                "name": "Deadpoolio the Amazing",

	}{
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Select{}, clause.From{}, clause.GroupBy{
				Columns: []clause.Column{{Name: "role"}},
				Having:  []clause.Expression{clause.Eq{"role", "admin"}},
			}},
			"SELECT * FROM `users` GROUP BY `role` HAVING `role` = ?",
			[]interface{}{"admin"},
		},
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Select{}, clause.From{}, clause.GroupBy{
				Columns: []clause.Column{{Name: "role"}},

 * }
 * }
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 12.0
 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could

                                }
                            },
                        },
                    },
                },
            },
            "/users/": {
                "post": {
                    "tags": ["users"],
                    "summary": "Create User",
                    "operationId": "create_user_users__post",
                    "requestBody": {
                        "content": {

from fastapi import FastAPI

app = FastAPI()


@app.get("/items/", tags=["items"])
async def read_items():
    return [{"name": "Foo", "price": 42}]


@app.get("/users/", tags=["users"])
async def read_users():
    return [{"username": "johndoe"}]


@app.get("/elements/", tags=["items"], deprecated=True)
async def read_elements():

from fastapi import Depends, FastAPI

from .dependencies import get_query_token, get_token_header
from .internal import admin
from .routers import items, users

app = FastAPI(dependencies=[Depends(get_query_token)])


app.include_router(users.router)
app.include_router(items.router)
app.include_router(
    admin.router,
    prefix="/admin",
    tags=["admin"],
    dependencies=[Depends(get_token_header)],

app = FastAPI()

router = APIRouter()


@router.get("/users/{id}")
def read_user(segment: str, id: str):
    return {"segment": segment, "id": id}


app.include_router(router, prefix="/{segment}")


client = TestClient(app)


def test_get():
    response = client.get("/seg/users/foo")
    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text

    without any of its other classes -- but is also available in a second
    "version" that omits the class to avoid conflicts with the copy in Guava
    itself. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

    - If users want all of Guava, they depend on guava, which, as of Guava
    27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...