* </p>
 *
 * <p>
 * The following are key functionalities provided by the Toolchain interface:</p><ul>
 *   <li>Access to the type of the toolchain (e.g., JDK, compiler).</li>
 *   <li>Retrieval of the specific version of the toolchain.</li>
 *   <li>Configuration of toolchain properties to match the project's requirements.</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Example usage:</p>
 * <pre>
 * Toolchain toolchain = ...; // Obtain a Toolchain instance

 *
 * <p>Each result is linked to its originating {@link Request}, allowing for:
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Traceability between requests and their outcomes</li>
 *   <li>Access to the session context used during processing</li>
 *   <li>Correlation of results with their initiating parameters</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @param <REQ> the type of Request that produced this result, ensuring type-safe

<style>
  main ul li { margin: 0.5em 0; }
</style>

## DRAFT RELEASE NOTES — Introduction to Go 1.26 {#introduction}

**Go 1.26 is not yet released. These are work-in-progress release notes.

 *
 * <p>Produced artifacts includes:</p><ul>
 *     <li>{@linkplain Project#getPomArtifact() the project POM artifact}</li>
 *     <li>{@linkplain Project#getMainArtifact() the main artifact}</li>
 *     <li>{@linkplain org.apache.maven.api.services.ProjectManager#attachArtifact(Session, Project, Path) artifacts to be attached to a project}</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>For the main artifact and attached artifacts, the

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which

    visibility = Visibility.PUBLIC;
  }

  /**
   * Tests all top-level {@link Serializable} classes in the package. For a serializable Class
   * {@code C}:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>If {@code C} explicitly implements {@link Object#equals}, the deserialized instance will
   *       be checked to be equal to the instance before serialization.

							id="searchOptionsButton">
							<em class="fa fa-cog"> <span class="visually-hidden"><la:message
									key="labels.header_form_option_btn" /></span>
						</button>
					</div>
				</div>
				<ul class="nav navbar-nav d-none d-md-flex">
					<c:if test="${eoled}">
						<li class="nav-item" data-bs-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="left" title="<la:message key="labels.eol_error" />">

							id="searchOptionsButton">
							<em class="fa fa-cog"> <span class="visually-hidden"><la:message
									key="labels.header_form_option_btn" /></span>
						</button>
					</div>
				</div>
				<ul class="nav navbar-nav d-none d-md-flex">
					<c:if test="${eoled}">
						<li class="nav-item" data-bs-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="left" title="<la:message key="labels.eol_error" />">

     * <p>
     * The implementation may optimize the execution by:
     * <ul>
     *   <li>Returning cached results for previously executed requests</li>
     *   <li>Grouping similar requests for batch processing</li>
     *   <li>Processing requests in parallel where appropriate</li>
     * </ul>
     *
     * @param <REQ> The request type
     * @param <REP> The response type

   *       {@code cls}:
   *       <ul>
   *         <li>Test will fail if default value for a parameter cannot be determined.
   *         <li>Test will fail if the factory method returns null so testing instance methods is
   *             impossible.
   *         <li>Test will fail if the constructor or factory method throws exception.
   *       </ul>