protected SmbResource adapt(FileEntry e) {
                    return resource;
                }
            };
        });
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Complex scenario with multiple filter conditions")
    void complexFilterScenario() throws Exception {
        // Setup: three entries with different filter results
        FileEntry entry1 = mock(FileEntry.class);

        assertEquals(State.CLOSED, circuitBreaker.getState(), "Circuit should be CLOSED after success threshold");

        // Test max attempts in half-open with failure scenario
        circuitBreaker.trip(); // Open again
        Thread.sleep(1100); // Wait for reset

        // First attempt transitions to HALF_OPEN
        try {

                case "test.property":
                    return "config-value";
                case "filter.null":
                    // This would be filtered to null by PropertyFilter in real scenario
                    throw new ConfigPropertyNotFoundException("filter.null");
                default:
                    throw new ConfigPropertyNotFoundException(propertyKey);
                }
            }

                log.warn("Error creating SmbFile from cache for {}: {}", fileInfo.getName(), e.getMessage());
                // For testing purposes, continue processing other files
                // In a real scenario, you might want to handle this differently
            }
        }

        return files;
    }

    /**
     * Update directory cache with new listing
     *

        // When
        request.setFileId(testFileId);

        // Then - verify through internal state (would need getter or reflection in real scenario)
        // Since we can't directly verify the internal state, we create a new request to test
        Smb2CloseRequest newRequest = new Smb2CloseRequest(mockConfig, testFileId);

    }

    // Test getExecuteType method
    public void test_getExecuteType() {
        assertEquals(Constants.EXECUTE_TYPE_CRAWLER, crawlJob.getExecuteType());
    }

    // Test execute method with runAll scenario
    public void test_execute_runAll() {
        // Setup test
        crawlJob = new CrawlJob() {
            @Override
            protected int getRunningJobCount() {
                return 0;
            }

    constructor(
      @JvmField var headerTableSizeSetting: Int = SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE,
      private val useCompression: Boolean = true,
      private val out: Buffer,
    ) {
      /**
       * In the scenario where the dynamic table size changes multiple times between transmission of
       * header blocks, we need to keep track of the smallest value in that interval.
       */

Usando essas ideias, o JWT pode ser usado para cenários muito mais sofisticados.

Nesses casos, várias dessas entidades poderiam ter o mesmo ID, digamos `foo` (um usuário `foo`, um carro `foo` e uma postagem de blog `foo`).

        verify(request).size();
        verify(request).getOverrideTimeout();
        verify(request).allowChain(nextRequest);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test chaining scenario with multiple requests")
    void testChainingScenario() {
        // Given
        CommonServerMessageBlockRequest thirdRequest = mock(CommonServerMessageBlockRequest.class);

### Bug or Regression

- An inefficient lock in EndpointSlice controller metrics cache has been reworked. Network programming latency may be significantly reduced in certain scenarios, especially in clusters with a large number of Services. ([#107167](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/107167), [@robscott](https://github.com/robscott)) [SIG Apps and Network]