*       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *
 * <p>The {@link #count} and {@link #size} implementations all iterate across the set returned by
 * {@link Multiset#entrySet()}, as do many methods acting on the set returned by {@link
 * #elementSet()}. Override those methods for better performance.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
abstract class AbstractSortedMultiset<E extends @Nullable Object> extends AbstractMultiset<E>

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

import gradlebuild.docs.dsl.docbook.model.MethodDoc;
import org.w3c.dom.Document;
import org.w3c.dom.Element;

public class MethodTableRenderer {
    public void renderTo(Iterable<MethodDoc> methods, Element parent) {
        Document document = parent.getOwnerDocument();

        // <thead>
        //   <tr>
        //     <td>Method</td>
        //     <td>Description</td>
        //   </tr>

                  + "Subscriber methods must have exactly 1 parameter.",
              method,
              parameterTypes.length);

          checkArgument(
              !parameterTypes[0].isPrimitive(),
              "@Subscribe method %s's parameter is %s. "
                  + "Subscriber methods cannot accept primitives. "
                  + "Consider changing the parameter to %s.",

 *
 * <p>Subclasses are guaranteed that the life cycle methods ({@link #runOneIteration}, {@link
 * #startUp} and {@link #shutDown}) will never run concurrently. Notably, if any execution of {@link
 * #runOneIteration} takes longer than its schedule defines, then subsequent executions may start
 * late. Also, all life cycle methods are executed with a lock held, so subclasses can safely modify