searchBody.put("name", "test_webconfig");
        String res = checkMethodBase(searchBody).get("/api/admin/webconfig/settings").asString();
        List<String> webConfigList = JsonPath.from(res).getList("response.settings.findAll {it.name.startsWith(\"test_webconfig\")}.id");
        return webConfigList.get(0);
    }

    @AfterEach
    void deleteWebConfig() {

        searchBody.put("size", NUM * 2);
        String response = checkGetMethod(searchBody, getListEndpointSuffix()).asString();
        List<Map<String, String>> attrList = JsonPath.from(response).getList(getJsonPath() + ".attributes");
        assertEquals(NUM, attrList.size());
        for (Map<String, String> attr : attrList) {
            assertTrue(attr.containsKey("gidNumber"));

        assertEquals("t1", kuromojiItem.getToken());
        assertEquals("s1", kuromojiItem.getSegmentation());
        assertEquals("r1", kuromojiItem.getReading());
        assertEquals("p1", kuromojiItem.getPos());
        assertNull(kuromojiItem.getNewToken());
        assertNull(kuromojiItem.getNewSegmentation());
        assertNull(kuromojiItem.getNewReading());
        assertNull(kuromojiItem.getNewPos());

        final List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>();
        list.add("リスト1");
        list.add("リスト2");
        list.add("リスト3");
        assertEquals(list, entity.getList());
    }

    public void test_getData_dataMap_entity_emptyList() throws Exception {
        final String value = "<?xml version=\"1.0\"?>\n"//
                + "<doc>\n"//

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Provider;

/**
 * Represents a dependency node within a Maven project's dependency collector.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.services.DependencyResolverResult#getRoot()
 */
@Experimental
@Immutable
@Provider
public interface Node {

    /**
     * @return artifact for this node
     */
    @Nullable
    Artifact getArtifact();

    /**

Konkret geht es darum, Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI miteinander zu vergleichen (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

* **Uvicorn**: ein ASGI-Server

    assertEquals("foo", Iterators.getLast(iterator, "bar"));
  }

  public void testGetLast_withDefault_empty() {
    Iterator<String> iterator = emptyIterator();
    assertEquals("bar", Iterators.getLast(iterator, "bar"));
  }

  public void testGetLast_withDefault_empty_null() {
    Iterator<String> iterator = emptyIterator();
    assertNull(Iterators.<@Nullable String>getLast(iterator, null));
  }

  override fun getLocalPort(): Int = delegate!!.localPort

  @Throws(IOException::class)
  override fun getOutputStream(): OutputStream = delegate!!.outputStream

  override fun getPort(): Int = delegate!!.port

  @Throws(SocketException::class)
  override fun getSoLinger(): Int = delegate!!.soLinger

  @Throws(SocketException::class)

          <description>
            The proxy port. Note: While the type of this field is {@code String} for technical
            reasons, the semantic type is actually {@code int}.
            @see #getPort()
          </description>
          <type>String</type>
          <defaultValue>8080</defaultValue>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>host</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>

     */
    public void setServer(final String server) {
        this.server = server;
    }

    /**
     * Returns the SMB server port.
     * @return the server port
     */
    public int getPort() {
        return port;
    }

    /**
     * Sets the SMB server port.
     * @param port the server port to set
     */
    public void setPort(final int port) {
        this.port = port;
    }