*
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
public interface EncryptOptions extends Options {
    /**
     * Should the operation be forced (ie overwrite existing config, if any).
     *
     * @return an {@link Optional} containing the boolean value {@code true} if specified, or empty
     */
    Optional<Boolean> force();

    /**
     * Should imply "yes" to all questions.

 * <h3>Extension</h3>
 *
 * If you want a class like {@code FluentFuture} but with extra methods, we recommend declaring your
 * own subclass of {@link ListenableFuture}, complete with a method like {@link #from} to adapt an
 * existing {@code ListenableFuture}, implemented atop a {@link ForwardingListenableFuture} that
 * forwards to that future and adds the desired methods.
 */
@GwtCompatible

    }

    /**
     * Tests the append method of the DfsReferral class.
     * It verifies that a new DfsReferral object can be successfully appended to an existing one,
     * forming a linked list structure.
     */
    @Test
    void testAppend() {
        // Given
        DfsReferral initialReferral = new DfsReferral();

/**
 * File System Control Code (FSCC) structure for File Rename Information.
 * Used in SMB2/SMB3 set file information operations to rename files or directories,
 * with support for specifying whether to replace existing files with the same name.
 *
 * @author mbechler
 */
public class FileRenameInformation2 implements FileInformation {

    private boolean replaceIfExists;
    private String fileName;

    /**

    /**
     * Create a new random lease key
     */
    public Smb2LeaseKey() {
        this.key = new byte[LEASE_KEY_SIZE];
        RANDOM.nextBytes(this.key);
    }

    /**
     * Create a lease key from existing bytes
     *
     * @param key 16-byte array
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if key is not 16 bytes
     */
    public Smb2LeaseKey(byte[] key) {
        if (key == null) {

            op.setup(form -> {
                form.initialize();
                form.crudMode = CrudMode.CREATE;
            });
        });
    }

    /**
     * Displays the form for editing an existing related query item.
     *
     * @param form the edit form containing the ID of the item to edit
     * @return HTML response for the edit form
     */
    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE })

 * requirement that existing callers already fulfill).
 *
 * Disclaimer: Part of the reason that callers are so well adapted to `Function<A, B>` may be that
 * that is how the signature looked even prior to this comment! So naturally any change can break
 * existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed

            chain = appendFilterChain(element, chain);
        }
        filterChain = chain;
    }

    /**
     * Appends a filter to the existing filter chain.
     *
     * @param filter the filter to append
     * @param chain the existing filter chain
     * @return a new filter chain with the filter appended
     */
    protected FilterChain appendFilterChain(final Filter filter, final FilterChain chain) {

        }
        return asJson(new ApiResult.ApiUpdateResponse().id(entity.getId()).created(true).status(ApiResult.Status.OK).result());
    }

    /**
     * Updates an existing user setting.
     *
     * @param body the user data to update
     * @return JSON response containing the updated user setting ID
     */
    // PUT /api/admin/user/setting
    @Execute

  }

  /**
   * This is an extraordinary test case. Here's what it's trying to simulate.
   * - 2 requests happen concurrently to a host that can be coalesced onto a single connection.
   * - Both request discover no existing connection. They both make a connection.
   * - The first request "wins the race".
   * - The second request discovers it "lost the race" and closes the connection it just opened.