- The scheduling queue didn't notice any extenders' failures, it could miss some cluster events,
  and it could end up Pods rejected by Extenders stuck in unschedulable pod pool in 5min in the worst-case scenario.
  Now, the scheduling queue notices extenders' failures and requeue Pods rejected by Extenders appropriately. ([#122043](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/122043), [@sanposhiho](https://github.com/sanposhiho)) [SIG Scheduling]

	// for this instance of unlocker, we should let the
	// caller know that lock is not successfully released
	// yet.
	if len(locks)-tolerance == tolerance {
		// In case of split brain scenarios where
		// tolerance is exactly half of the len(*locks)
		// then we need to make sure we have unlocked
		// upto tolerance+1 - especially for RUnlock
		// to ensure that we don't end up with active

### Um Processo por Contêiner

Nesse tipo de cenário, provavelmente você desejará ter **um único processo (Uvicorn) por contêiner**, pois já estaria lidando com a replicação no nível do cluster.

- Cleanup subnet in frontend IP configs to prevent huge subnet request bodies in some scenarios. ([#98290](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/98290), [@nilo19](https://github.com/nilo19)) [SIG Cloud Provider]

// as a hex encoded string
func (p *PutObjReader) MD5CurrentHexString() string {
	md5sumCurr := p.rawReader.MD5Current()
	var appendHyphen bool
	// md5sumcurr is not empty in two scenarios
	// - server is running in strict compatibility mode
	// - client set Content-Md5 during PUT operation
	if len(md5sumCurr) == 0 {
		// md5sumCurr is only empty when we are running
		// in non-compatibility mode.

		// Optimization for certain applications like
		// - Cohesity
		// - Actifio, Splunk etc.
		// which send ListObjects requests where the actual object
		// itself is the prefix and max-keys=1 in such scenarios
		// we can simply verify locally if such an object exists
		// to avoid the need for ListObjects().
		objInfo, err := z.GetObjectInfo(ctx, bucket, prefix, ObjectOptions{NoLock: true})
		if err == nil {

### Ein Prozess pro Container

In einem solchen Szenario möchten Sie wahrscheinlich **einen einzelnen (Uvicorn-)Prozess pro Container** haben, da Sie die Replikation bereits auf Cluster ebene durchführen würden.

					storageLogOnceIf(ctx, err, "read-data-add-legacy-"+dstFilePath)
				}
				legacyPreserved = true
			}
		}
	} else {
		// It is possible that some drives may not have `xl.meta` file
		// in such scenarios verify if at least `part.1` files exist
		// to verify for legacy version.
		if formatLegacy {
			// We only need this code if we are moving
			// from `xl.json` to `xl.meta`, we can avoid

    deletion of the Node object, deletion of the instance in the cloud provider,
    or force deletion of the pod from the api-server).
    This helps prevent "split brain" scenarios in clustered applications by
    ensuring that unreachable pods will not be presumed dead unless some
    "fencing" operation has provided one of the above indications.

**Note**: You probably don't need `contextvars`, and you should probably avoid using them. But they are powerful and useful in some advanced scenarios, for example, migrating from code that used Flask's `g` semi-global variable.