verifyNfold("password", 7,
                new byte[] { (byte) 0x78, (byte) 0xa0, (byte) 0x7b, (byte) 0x6c, (byte) 0xaf, (byte) 0x85, (byte) 0xfa });

        // 64-fold("Rough Consensus, and Running Code")
        verifyNfold("Rough Consensus, and Running Code", 8,
                new byte[] { (byte) 0xbb, (byte) 0x6e, (byte) 0xd3, (byte) 0x08, (byte) 0x70, (byte) 0xb7, (byte) 0xf0, (byte) 0xe0 });

        // 64-fold("kerberos")

		lastUpdate:   metaCacheTestsetTimestamp.Add(-8 * time.Minute),
		lastHandout:  metaCacheTestsetTimestamp,
		dataVersion:  metacacheStreamVersion,
	},
	7: {
		id:           "case-8-running",
		bucket:       "bucket",
		root:         "folder/running",
		recursive:    false,
		status:       scanStateStarted,
		fileNotFound: false,
		error:        "",
		started:      metaCacheTestsetTimestamp.Add(-1 * time.Minute),

        return resultBuf.toString();

    }

    /**
     * Gets the count of currently running crawler jobs.
     * This method queries the scheduled jobs to count active crawler processes.
     * Used to enforce maximum concurrent crawler limits.
     *
     * @return the number of currently running crawler jobs
     */
    protected int getRunningJobCount() {

      <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> tip </font></span>  Running in development mode, for production use:
             <b>fastapi run</b>

             Logs:

# Benchmarks { #benchmarks }

Independent TechEmpower benchmarks show **FastAPI** applications running under Uvicorn as <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=test&runid=7464e520-0dc2-473d-bd34-dbdfd7e85911&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijzen-7" class="external-link" target="_blank">one of the fastest Python frameworks available</a>, only below Starlette and Uvicorn themselves (used internally by FastAPI).

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

You could load it at the top level of the module/file, but that would also mean that it would **load the model** even if you are just running a simple automated test, then that test would be **slow** because it would have to wait for the model to load before being able to run an independent part of the code.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  healthcheck:
    test: ["CMD", "mc", "ready", "local"]
    interval: 5s
    timeout: 5s
    retries: 5

# starts 4 docker containers running minio server instances.
# using nginx reverse proxy, load balancing, you can access
# it through port 9000.
services:
  minio1:
    <<: *minio-common
    hostname: minio1
    volumes:
      - edata1-1:/edata1

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see