end = srcIndex + rDataLength;
        /* Apparently readRDataWireFormat can return 0 if resultCode != 0 in
        which case this will look indefinitely. Putting this else clause around
        the loop might fix that. But I would need to see a capture to confirm.
        if (resultCode != 0) {
            srcIndex += rDataLength;
        } else {
        */
        for (addrIndex = 0; srcIndex < end; addrIndex++) {

        /*
         * Apparently readRDataWireFormat can return 0 if resultCode != 0 in
         * which case this will look indefinitely. Putting this else clause around
         * the loop might fix that. But I would need to see a capture to confirm.
         * if (resultCode != 0) {
         * srcIndex += rDataLength;
         * } else {
         */

   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner") // String.repeat unavailable under Java 8
  public void testCopyWithReaderThatDoesNotFillBuffer() throws IOException {

   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner") // String.repeat unavailable under Java 8
  public void testCopyWithReaderThatDoesNotFillBuffer() throws IOException {

                }
            }
            throw new ThumbnailGenerationException("Failed to process a thumbnail content: " + url + " (Redirect Loop)");
        });
    }

    /**
     * Sets the list of generator names.
     * @param generatorList The list of generator names.
     */
    public void setGeneratorList(final List<String> generatorList) {

    }
  },
  /**
   * This strategy uses all 128 bits of {@link Hashing#murmur3_128} when hashing. It looks different
   * from the implementation in MURMUR128_MITZ_32 because we're avoiding the multiplication in the
   * loop and doing a (much simpler) += hash2. We're also changing the index to a positive number by
   * AND'ing with Long.MAX_VALUE instead of flipping the bits.
   */
  MURMUR128_MITZ_64() {
    @Override

   * #remove} to forward to this implementation.
   *
   * <p>Alternately, you may wish to override {@link #remove} with {@code keySet().remove}, assuming
   * that approach would not lead to an infinite loop.
   *
   * @since 7.0
   */
  protected @Nullable V standardRemove(@Nullable Object key) {
    Iterator<Entry<K, V>> entryIterator = entrySet().iterator();
    while (entryIterator.hasNext()) {

			if length > 0 && field.Size > 0 {
				alterColumn = true
			} else {
				// has size in data type and not equal
				// Since the following code is frequently called in the for loop, reg optimization is needed here
				matches2 := regFullDataType.FindAllStringSubmatch(fullDataType, -1)
				if !field.PrimaryKey &&
					(len(matches2) == 1 && matches2[0][1] != fmt.Sprint(length) && ok) {

   * iterable}. The iterator's {@code hasNext()} method returns {@code true} until {@code iterable}
   * is empty.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Typical uses of the resulting iterator may produce an infinite loop. You
   * should use an explicit {@code break} or be certain that you will eventually remove all the
   * elements.
   *
   * <p>To cycle over the iterable {@code n} times, use the following: {@code

print an empty string too.
Worse, there is no guarantee that the write to <code>done</code> will ever
be observed by <code>main</code>, since there are no synchronization
events between the two threads.  The loop in <code>main</code> is not
guaranteed to finish.
</p>

<p>
There are subtler variants on this theme, such as this program.
</p>

<pre>
type T struct {
	msg string
}

var g *T