private final ElementOrder<E> edgeOrder;

  final MapIteratorCache<N, NetworkConnections<N, E>> nodeConnections;

  // We could make this a Map<E, EndpointPair<N>>. It would make incidentNodes(edge) slightly
  // faster, but also make Networks consume 5 to 20+% (increasing with average degree) more memory.
  final MapIteratorCache<E, N> edgeToReferenceNode; // referenceNode == source if directed

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Comparing two approaches to a use case side by side can make it easier to examine the
        differences between them.


        Additionally, it's very useful to us if you can provide a "straw API" — what the

        By asking questions in a structured way (following this) it will be much easier to help you.

        And there's a high chance that you will find the solution along the way and you won't even have to submit it and wait for an answer. 😎

OkHttp 1.x Change Log
=====================

## Version 1.6.0

_2014-05-23_

 * Offer bridges to make it easier to migrate from OkHttp 1.x to OkHttp 2.0.
   This adds `OkUrlFactory`, `Cache`, and `@Deprecated` annotations for APIs
   dropped in 2.0.

## Version 1.5.4

_2014-04-14_

 * Drop ALPN support in Android. There's a concurrency bug in all
   currently-shipping versions.

   * permits? As explained above, there is no unique answer. If we are primarily interested to deal
   * with underutilization, then we want stored permits to be given out /faster/ than fresh ones,
   * because underutilization = free resources for the taking. If we are primarily interested to
   * deal with overflow, then stored permits could be given out /slower/ than fresh ones. Thus, we

### Certificate Directory

	}
	if _, err := newErasureSets(ctx, ep, storageDisks, format, parity, 0); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Unable to initialize erasure")
	}
}

// TestHashedLayer - tests the hashed layer which will be returned
// consistently for a given object name.
func TestHashedLayer(t *testing.T) {
	// Test distribution with 16 sets.
	var objs [16]*erasureObjects
	for i := range objs {

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Bytes.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(double[] array, int distance) {

    Optional<String> optionalName = Optional.fromNullable("bob");
    assertEquals("bob", optionalName.get());
  }

  public void testFromNullable_null() {
    // not promised by spec, but easier to test
    assertSame(Optional.absent(), Optional.fromNullable(null));
  }

  public void testIsPresent_no() {
    assertFalse(Optional.absent().isPresent());
  }

set the env. variable `MINIO_KMS_SECRET_KEY` and start/restart the MinIO server. For more details about KES and how
to set it up refer to our [KMS Guide](https://github.com/minio/minio/blob/master/docs/kms/README.md).

Instead of configuring an external KMS you can start with a single key by
setting the env. variable `MINIO_KMS_SECRET_KEY`. It expects the following
format:

```sh