}),
        (accum, t) -> {
          /*
           * We assign these to variables before calling checkNotNull to work around a bug in our
           * nullness checker.
           */
          K key = keyFunction.apply(t);
          V newValue = valueFunction.apply(t);
          accum.put(

                }),
        (accum, t) -> {
          /*
           * We assign these to variables before calling checkNotNull to work around a bug in our
           * nullness checker.
           */
          K key = keyFunction.apply(t);
          V newValue = valueFunction.apply(t);
          accum.put(

    }
    return dummy;
  }

  /**
   * Similar to the above, but keeps a boolean flag rather than checking for the string accumulated
   * so far being empty. As a result, it does not have the above-mentioned bug.
   */
  @Benchmark
  int booleanIfFirst(int reps) {
    int dummy = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
      boolean append = false;

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

    - [Other (Bug, Cleanup or Flake)](#other-bug-cleanup-or-flake)
- [v1.15.10](#v11510)
  - [Downloads for v1.15.10](#downloads-for-v11510)
    - [Client Binaries](#client-binaries-2)
    - [Server Binaries](#server-binaries-2)
    - [Node Binaries](#node-binaries-2)
  - [Changelog since v1.15.9](#changelog-since-v1159)
  - [Changes by Kind](#changes-by-kind-2)

    assertThat(record.getMessage()).isEqualTo("message");
    assertThat(record.getThrown()).isEqualTo(EXCEPTION);
  }

  public void testConcurrentModification() throws Exception {
    // Tests for the absence of a bug where logging while iterating over the
    // stored log records causes a ConcurrentModificationException
    assertTrue(handler.getStoredLogRecords().isEmpty());
    ExampleClassUnderTest.foo();
    ExampleClassUnderTest.foo();

    - [Removed metrics](#removed-metrics)
    - [Deprecated metrics](#deprecated-metrics)
  - [Notable Features](#notable-features)
  - [API Changes](#api-changes)
  - [Detailed Bug Fixes And Changes](#detailed-bug-fixes-and-changes)
    - [API Machinery](#api-machinery)
    - [Apps](#apps)
    - [Auth](#auth)
    - [AWS](#aws)
    - [Azure](#azure)
    - [CLI](#cli)
    - [Cloud Provider](#cloud-provider)

    Object result =
        RegularImmutableMap.get(keyHashTable, alternatingKeysAndValues, size, keyOffset, key);
    /*
     * We can't simply cast the result of `RegularImmutableMap.get` to V because of a bug in our
     * nullness checker (resulting from https://github.com/jspecify/checker-framework/issues/8).
     */
    if (result == null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      return (V) result;
    }
  }

-->

#### What type of PR is this?

<!--
Add one of the following kinds:
/kind bug
/kind dependency
/kind cleanup
/kind documentation
/kind feature

Optionally add one or more of the following kinds if applicable:
/kind api-change
/kind deprecation
/kind failing-test
/kind flake