Graph<?> graph, Object nextNode, @Nullable Object previousNode) {
    if (graph.isDirected() || !Objects.equals(previousNode, nextNode)) {
      return true;
    }
    // This falls into the undirected A->B->A case. The Graph interface does not support parallel
    // edges, so this traversal would require reusing the undirected AB edge.
    return false;
  }

  /**

{!> ../../docs_src/bigger_applications/app_an/dependencies.py!}
```

////

//// tab | Python 3.8+ nicht annotiert

/// tip | Tipp

Bevorzugen Sie die `Annotated`-Version, falls möglich.

///

```Python hl_lines="1  4-6" title="app/dependencies.py"
{!> ../../docs_src/bigger_applications/app/dependencies.py!}
```

////

/// tip | Tipp

   * stripes, the intended concurrency level, and the typical number of keys used in a {@code
   * bulkGet(keys)} operation. See <a href="http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath199.htm">Balls in
   * Bins model</a> for mathematical formulas that can be used to estimate the probability of
   * collisions.
   *
   * @param keys arbitrary non-null keys

      Graph<?> graph, Object nextNode, @Nullable Object previousNode) {
    if (graph.isDirected() || !Objects.equals(previousNode, nextNode)) {
      return true;
    }
    // This falls into the undirected A->B->A case. The Graph interface does not support parallel
    // edges, so this traversal would require reusing the undirected AB edge.
    return false;
  }

  /**

    /**
     * The version of this test supplied by {@link MapInterfaceTest} fails for this particular map
     * implementation, because {@code map.get()} returns a view collection that changes in the
     * course of a call to {@code remove()}. Thus, the expectation doesn't hold that {@code
     * map.remove(x)} returns the same value which {@code map.get(x)} did immediately beforehand.
     */
    @Override
    public void testRemove() {

    return isEmpty() ? -1 : 0;
  }

  int getSuccessor(int entryIndex) {
    return (entryIndex + 1 < size) ? entryIndex + 1 : -1;
  }

  /**
   * Updates the index an iterator is pointing to after a call to remove: returns the index of the
   * entry that should be looked at after a removal on indexRemoved, with indexBeforeRemove as the
   * index that *was* the next entry that would be looked at.
   */

          // may generate something like <capture#1-of ? extends Foo&SubFoo>.
          // Checking subtype between declared and actual type bounds
          // adds recursive isSubtypeOf() call and feels complicated.
          // There is no contract one way or another as long as isSubtypeOf() works as expected.
          combined.addAll(asList(typeParam.getBounds()));

        newCapacity = Integer.MAX_VALUE; // guaranteed to be >= newCapacity
      }
      return newCapacity;
    }

    /**
     * Returns a new immutable array. The builder can continue to be used after this call, to append
     * more values and build again.
     *
     * <p><b>Performance note:</b> the returned array is backed by the same array as the builder, so

  using tensorflow::AttrBuilder::AttrBuilder;
  // The string buffers to make sure that any `attr_name` we pass into
  // `builder->Set()` will outlive the subsequent
  // `TF_AttrBuilderCheckCanRunOnDevice()` call(s) on the same `builder`.
  std::set<std::string> attr_names;
};

TF_AttrBuilder* TF_NewAttrBuilder(const char* op_name) {
  return new TF_AttrBuilder(op_name);
}

      assertEquals(Integer.valueOf(VALUE_PREFIX + i), cache.getUnchecked(KEY_PREFIX + i));
      assertFalse("Loader should NOT have been called @#" + i, loader.wasCalled());
    }

    // wait for entries to expire, but don't call expireEntries
    ticker.advance(EXPIRING_TIME * 10, MILLISECONDS);

    // add a single unexpired entry
    cache.getUnchecked(KEY_PREFIX + 11);

    // collections views shouldn't expose expired entries