*/
    public static class IntervalRule {
        /** Starting hour of the interval */
        protected int fromHours;

        /** Starting minute of the interval */
        protected int fromMinutes;

        /** Ending hour of the interval */
        protected int toHours;

        /** Ending minute of the interval */
        protected int toMinutes;

   * convenient.
   *
   * <p>By default, a {@code Builder} will generate maps that iterate over entries in the order they
   * were inserted into the builder, equivalently to {@code LinkedHashMap}. For example, in the
   * above example, {@code WORD_TO_INT.entrySet()} is guaranteed to iterate over the entries in the
   * order {@code "one"=1, "two"=2, "three"=3}, and {@code keySet()} and {@code values()} respect

   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link
   * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}.
   *

   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link
   * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}.
   *

   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link
   * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}.
   *

   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link
   * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}.
   *

   */
  public PatternFilenameFilter(Pattern pattern) {
    this.pattern = Preconditions.checkNotNull(pattern);
  }

  /*
   * Our implementation works fine with a null `dir`. However, there's nothing in the documentation
   * of the supertype that suggests that implementations are expected to tolerate null. That said, I
   * see calls in Google code that pass a null `dir` to a FilenameFilter.... So let's declare the

 * information</i>.
 *
 * <h3>Invertibility</h3>
 *
 * <p>The reverse operation <b>may</b> be a strict <i>inverse</i> (meaning that {@code
 * converter.reverse().convert(converter.convert(a)).equals(a)} is always true). However, it is very
 * common (perhaps <i>more</i> common) for round-trip conversion to be <i>lossy</i>. Consider an
 * example round-trip using {@link com.google.common.primitives.Doubles#stringConverter}:
 *
 * <ol>

    checkNotNull(target, "target");
    if (target.length == 0) {
      return 0;
    }

    outer:
    for (int i = 0; i < array.length - target.length + 1; i++) {
      for (int j = 0; j < target.length; j++) {
        if (array[i + j] != target[j]) {
          continue outer;
        }
      }
      return i;
    }
    return -1;
  }

  /**

   * the backport does. For now, we're keeping the class declaration in *both* flavors so that both
   * flavors can read old data or data from the other flavor. However, we strongly discourage
   * relying on this, as we have made incompatible changes to serialized forms in the past and
   * expect to do so again, as discussed in https://github.com/google/guava#important-warnings.
   */