rbacv1helpers.NewRule(bootstrappolicy.Read...).Groups("").Resources("services/proxy").RuleOrDie(),
}

// ungettableResources is the list of rules that don't allow to view (GET) them
// this is purposefully separate list to distinguish from escalating privs
var ungettableResources = []rbacv1.PolicyRule{
	rbacv1helpers.NewRule(bootstrappolicy.Read...).Groups("apps", "extensions").Resources("deployments/rollback").RuleOrDie(),
}

	nextMain:      nextComposed,
}, {
	form:          NFKD,
	composing:     false,
	compatibility: true,
	info:          lookupInfoNFKC,
	nextMain:      nextDecomposed,
}}

// We do not distinguish between boundaries for NFC, NFD, etc. to avoid
// unexpected behavior for the user.  For example, in NFD, there is a boundary
// after 'a'.  However, 'a' might combine with modifiers, so from the application's

	"conditions":         "conditions contains information about the current status of the endpoint.",
	"hostname":           "hostname of this endpoint. This field may be used by consumers of endpoints to distinguish endpoints from each other (e.g. in DNS names). Multiple endpoints which use the same hostname should be considered fungible (e.g. multiple A values in DNS). Must be lowercase and pass DNS Label (RFC 1123) validation.",

// Finally, you are free to instantiate the pattern with the types you
// want.  If you put the above code in a header file, you can #include
// it in multiple C++ source files and instantiate it multiple times.
//
// To distinguish different instances of the pattern, the first
// argument to the INSTANTIATE_* macro is a prefix that will be added
// to the actual test case name.  Remember to pick unique prefixes for
// different instances.

var specialVerbsNoSubresources = sets.NewString("proxy")

// namespaceSubresources contains subresources of namespace
// this list allows the parser to distinguish between a namespace subresource, and a namespaced resource
var namespaceSubresources = sets.NewString("status", "finalize")

}

// DeploymentSpec is the specification of the desired behavior of the Deployment.
type DeploymentSpec struct {
	// Number of desired pods. This is a pointer to distinguish between explicit
	// zero and not specified. Defaults to 1.
	// +optional
	Replicas *int32 `json:"replicas,omitempty" protobuf:"varint,1,opt,name=replicas"`

     * StackOverflowError: We can't reliably call setException(error).
     *
     * - Any kind of Error from a listener. Even if we could distinguish that case (by exposing some
     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify

     * StackOverflowError: We can't reliably call setException(error).
     *
     * - Any kind of Error from a listener. Even if we could distinguish that case (by exposing some
     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify

     *
     * <p>
     * Unfortunately, this method cannot be split into two methods, one for {@link Dependency} and one for {@link DependencyConstraint},
     * because Groovy cannot distinguish between the two.
     * </p>
     *
     * @param dependencyOrDependencyConstraint dependency or dependency constraint to add
     */

	A struct{ B *B }
	B struct{ A *A }
)

func TestMutuallyRecursive(t *testing.T) {
	f := func(a A) bool { return true }
	Check(f, nil)
}

// Some serialization formats (e.g. encoding/pem) cannot distinguish
// between a nil and an empty map or slice, so avoid generating the
// zero value for these.
func TestNonZeroSliceAndMap(t *testing.T) {
	type Q struct {
		M map[int]int
		S []int
	}