common = i
					break
				}
			}
			a, b = a[common:], b[common:]
			if len(a) > 64 {
				a = a[:64]
			}
			if len(b) > 64 {
				b = b[:64]
			}
			t.Errorf("after %d common bytes, difference \nread: %x\nwrote:%x", common, a, b)
		}
		t.Fatalf("expect read %d bytes but got %d", wroteBytes, readBytes)
	}
	if readHash.Sum32() != wroteHash.Sum32() {

   * incorrect values. This is useful for testing methods that must treat the return value from
   * size() as a hint only.
   *
   * @param delta the difference between the true size of the collection and the values returned by
   *     the size method
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Collection<T> misleadingSizeCollection(int delta) {

	policiesToUpdate := set.CreateStringSet(policies...)
	var newPolicySet set.StringSet
	newPolicyMapping := mp
	if isAttach {
		// new policies to attach => inputPolicies - existing (set difference)
		policiesToUpdate = policiesToUpdate.Difference(existingPolicySet)
		// validate that new policies to add are defined.
		for _, p := range policiesToUpdate.ToSlice() {
			if _, found := cache.iamPolicyDocsMap[p]; !found {

   * addresses, the output follows <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5952">RFC 5952</a> section
   * 4. The main difference is that this method uses "::" for zero compression, while Java's version
   * uses the uncompressed form (except on Android, where the zero compression is also done). The
   * other difference is that this method outputs any scope ID in the format that it was provided at

If you can choose a more recent version of Python for your project, you will be able to take advantage of that extra simplicity.

In all the docs there are examples compatible with each version of Python (when there's a difference).

For example "**Python 3.6+**" means it's compatible with Python 3.6 or above (including 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, etc). And "**Python 3.9+**" means it's compatible with Python 3.9 or above (including 3.10, etc).

{* ../../docs_src/sql_databases/tutorial001_an_py310.py ln[1:11] hl[7:11] *}

The `Hero` class is very similar to a Pydantic model (in fact, underneath, it actually *is a Pydantic model*).

There are a few differences:

* `table=True` tells SQLModel that this is a *table model*, it should represent a **table** in the SQL database, it's not just a *data model* (as would be any other regular Pydantic class).

	// By default DB.DryRun should false
	if DB.DryRun {
		t.Fatal("Failed expect DB.DryRun to be false")
	}

	if DB.Dialector.Name() == "sqlserver" {
		t.Skip("Skip SQL Server for this test, because it too difference with other dialects.")
	}

	date, _ := time.ParseInLocation("2006-01-02", "2021-10-18", time.Local)

	// find
	sql := DB.ToSQL(func(tx *gorm.DB) *gorm.DB {

    /**
     * Performs constant-time comparison of two char arrays to prevent timing attacks.
     * This method always compares the full length of both arrays, regardless of when
     * differences are found, making the execution time independent of the position
     * of differing characters.
     *
     * @param a first char array to compare
     * @param b second char array to compare

     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?

     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather
     * than "less than or equal to" because of *handwave* the difference between "endpoints of
     * inclusive ranges" and "Cuts."
     */
    if (lowerBound.compareTo(otherRange.upperBound) < 0
        && otherRange.lowerBound.compareTo(upperBound) < 0) {