**Requests** é uma biblioteca para interagir com APIs (como um cliente), enquanto **FastAPI** é uma biblioteca para construir APIs (como um servidor).

Eles estão, mais ou menos, em pontas opostas, complementando-se.

Requests tem um design muito simples e intuitivo, é muito fácil de usar, com padrões sensatos. Mas ao mesmo tempo, é muito poderoso e personalizável.

É por isso que, como dito no site oficial:

abstract class AbstractMapBasedMultimap<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AbstractMultimap<K, V> implements Serializable {
  /*
   * Here's an outline of the overall design.
   *
   * The map variable contains the collection of values associated with each
   * key. When a key-value pair is added to a multimap that didn't previously
   * contain any values for that key, a new collection generated by

<img src="/img/tutorial/body/image03.png">

Sie bekommen auch Fehlermeldungen für inkorrekte Typoperationen:

<img src="/img/tutorial/body/image04.png">

Das ist nicht zufällig so, das ganze Framework wurde um dieses Design herum aufgebaut.

Und es wurde in der Designphase gründlich getestet, bevor irgendeine Implementierung stattfand, um sicherzustellen, dass es mit allen Editoren funktioniert.

}

// GetMultipartInfo returns multipart metadata uploaded during newMultipartUpload, used
// by callers to verify object states
// - encrypted
// - compressed
// Does not contain currently uploaded parts by design.
func (er erasureObjects) GetMultipartInfo(ctx context.Context, bucket, object, uploadID string, opts ObjectOptions) (MultipartInfo, error) {
	if !opts.NoAuditLog {
		auditObjectErasureSet(ctx, "GetMultipartInfo", object, &er)

Die beiden stehen mehr oder weniger an entgegengesetzten Enden und ergänzen sich.

Requests hat ein sehr einfaches und intuitives Design, ist sehr einfach zu bedienen und verfügt über sinnvolle Standardeinstellungen. Aber gleichzeitig ist es sehr leistungsstark und anpassbar.

Aus diesem Grund heißt es auf der offiziellen Website:

  // A note on memory visibility.
  // Many of the utilities in this class (transform, withFallback, withTimeout, asList, combine)
  // have two requirements that significantly complicate their design.
  // 1. Cancellation should propagate from the returned future to the input future(s).
  // 2. The returned futures shouldn't unnecessarily 'pin' their inputs after completion.
  //

 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,
 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.app.web.admin.design;

import java.io.File;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.nio.file.Files;
import java.nio.file.Path;

import org.codelibs.core.misc.Tuple3;
import org.codelibs.fess.helper.VirtualHostHelper;

 *
 *  * https://example.net/
 *
 *  * https://example.com/
 *
 * This is because those two hosts share the same IP address. This is an old, bad design decision
 * that makes `java.net.URL` unusable for many things. It shouldn't be used as a [Map] key or in a
 * [Set]. Doing so is both inefficient because equality may require a DNS lookup, and incorrect

* Add translation to Portuguese for [History, Design and Future - História, Design e Futuro](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/pt/history-design-future/). PR [#1249](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/1249) by [@marcosmmb](https://github.com/marcosmmb).

    /** The key of the message: Dashboard */
    public static final String LABELS_menu_dashboard_config = "{labels.menu_dashboard_config}";

    /** The key of the message: Page Design */
    public static final String LABELS_menu_design = "{labels.menu_design}";

    /** The key of the message: Dictionary */
    public static final String LABELS_menu_dict = "{labels.menu_dict}";