* </ol>
 * <p>By understanding and properly configuring repositories, developers can control where Maven looks for dependencies, manage access to proprietary artifacts, and optimize the build process to ensure consistency and reliability across projects.
 * </p>
 *
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 * @see Repository
 * @see LocalRepository
 * @see Session#getSettings()
 * @see ModelBase#getRepositories()

 * </ol>
 * By understanding and properly configuring repositories, developers can control where Maven looks for dependencies, manage access to proprietary artifacts, and optimize the build process to ensure consistency and reliability across projects.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 * @see RemoteRepository
 * @see LocalRepository
 */
@Experimental
@Immutable
public interface Repository {

    /**

   * without grabbing the lock.
   *
   * <p>To update this field correctly the lock must be held to guarantee that the state is
   * consistent.
   */
  private volatile StateSnapshot snapshot = new StateSnapshot(NEW);

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected AbstractService() {}

  /**

    void testMultipleEncodeOperations() {
        long endOfFile = 0x1234567890ABCDEFL;
        FileEndOfFileInformation info = new FileEndOfFileInformation(endOfFile);

        // Encode multiple times to verify consistency
        byte[] buffer1 = new byte[8];
        byte[] buffer2 = new byte[8];

        int bytes1 = info.encode(buffer1, 0);
        int bytes2 = info.encode(buffer2, 0);

        assertEquals(8, bytes1);

          !item.equals(NotAnInstance.EQUAL_TO_NOTHING));
      assertTrue(item + " must be Object#equals to itself", item.equals(item));
      assertEquals(
          "the Object#hashCode of " + item + " must be consistent",
          item.hashCode(),
          item.hashCode());
      if (!(item instanceof String)) {
        assertTrue(
            item + " must not be Object#equals to its Object#toString representation",

            // from being reused. Otherwise we're still obligated to transmit the request body to
            // leave the connection in a consistent state.
            exchange.noNewExchangesOnConnection()
          }
        }
      } else if (!isUpgradeRequest) {
        exchange.noRequestBody()
      }

 * {@code equals} would break symmetry, as the forwarding object might consider itself equal to the
 * object being tested, but the reverse could not be true. This behavior is consistent with the
 * JDK's collection wrappers, such as {@link java.util.Collections#unmodifiableCollection}. Use an
 * interface-specific subclass of {@code ForwardingObject}, such as {@link ForwardingList}, to

 * equality for both keys and values. This may not be the desired behavior for map implementations
 * that use non-standard notions of key equality, such as the entry of a {@code SortedMap} whose
 * comparator is not consistent with {@code equals}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @author Louis Wasserman

        assertNotNull(rp);
        assertEquals(name, rp.name(), "name() must match input");
        assertEquals(name, rp.toString(), "toString() should default to name()");
        // Ordinal is consistent with declaration order
        switch (name) {
        case "NONE":
            assertEquals(0, rp.ordinal());
            break;
        case "NO_TIMEOUT":
            assertEquals(1, rp.ordinal());

        }

        // Then - no exceptions should have been thrown
        assertTrue(true); // If we reach here, no exceptions occurred
    }

    /**
     * Test consistency across multiple calls
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test consistency across multiple calls")
    public void testConsistencyAcrossMultipleCalls() {
        // Given
        smbComTreeDisconnect = new SmbComTreeDisconnect(config);