}
	}
}

func TestNewRulesMap(t *testing.T) {
	rulesMapCase1 := make(RulesMap)
	rulesMapCase1.add([]Name{ObjectAccessedGet, ObjectAccessedHead, ObjectAccessedGetRetention, ObjectAccessedGetLegalHold, ObjectAccessedAttributes},
		"*", TargetID{"1", "webhook"})

	rulesMapCase2 := make(RulesMap)
	rulesMapCase2.add([]Name{
		ObjectAccessedGet, ObjectAccessedHead, ObjectAccessedAttributes,

            the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
        -->
        <test.add.opens>
          --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED
          --add-opens java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED
          --add-opens java.base/sun.security.jca=ALL-UNNAMED
        </test.add.opens>
      </properties>
    </profile>
    <profile>

            the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
        -->
        <test.add.opens>
          --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED
          --add-opens java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED
          --add-opens java.base/sun.security.jca=ALL-UNNAMED
        </test.add.opens>
      </properties>
    </profile>
    <profile>

    }

    public void addTag(final String tag) {
        tags.add(tag);
    }

    public void addRole(final String role) {
        roles.add(role);
    }

    public void addField(final String field) {
        fields.add(field);
    }

    public void addKind(final String kind) {
        kinds.add(kind);
    }

    public void setSuggestDetail(final boolean suggestDetail) {

     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  public void testAdd_supportedPresent() {
    assertTrue("add(present) should return true", getList().add(e0()));
    expectAdded(e0());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_ADD)
  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  /*
   * absent = ZERO isn't required, since unmodList.add() must
   * throw regardless, but it keeps the method name accurate.
   */

        .add(new Striped.LargeLazyStriped<Lock>(50, LOCK_SUPPLER))
        .add(new Striped.LargeLazyStriped<Lock>(64, LOCK_SUPPLER))
        .add(new Striped.SmallLazyStriped<Semaphore>(50, SEMAPHORE_SUPPLER))
        .add(new Striped.SmallLazyStriped<Semaphore>(64, SEMAPHORE_SUPPLER))
        .add(new Striped.LargeLazyStriped<Semaphore>(50, SEMAPHORE_SUPPLER))

        .add(new Striped.LargeLazyStriped<Lock>(50, LOCK_SUPPLER))
        .add(new Striped.LargeLazyStriped<Lock>(64, LOCK_SUPPLER))
        .add(new Striped.SmallLazyStriped<Semaphore>(50, SEMAPHORE_SUPPLER))
        .add(new Striped.SmallLazyStriped<Semaphore>(64, SEMAPHORE_SUPPLER))
        .add(new Striped.LargeLazyStriped<Semaphore>(50, SEMAPHORE_SUPPLER))

  public void testAdd_supportedNotPresent() {
    assertTrue("add(notPresent) should return true", collection.add(e3()));
    expectAdded(e3());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_ADD)
  public void testAdd_unsupportedNotPresent() {
    assertThrows(UnsupportedOperationException.class, () -> collection.add(e3()));
    expectUnchanged();
    expectMissing(e3());
  }

  public void testAdd_supportedNotPresent() {
    assertTrue("add(notPresent) should return true", collection.add(e3()));
    expectAdded(e3());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_ADD)
  public void testAdd_unsupportedNotPresent() {
    assertThrows(UnsupportedOperationException.class, () -> collection.add(e3()));
    expectUnchanged();
    expectMissing(e3());
  }