t.Fatalf("should raise error when create users without languages reference")
	}

	if err := DB.Create(&user.Languages).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("no error should happen when create languages, but got %v", err)
	}

	if err := DB.Omit("Languages.*").Create(&user).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("no error should happen when create user when languages exists, but got %v", err)
	}

            # as is just because it's an instance of a subclass of a more limited class
            # e.g. UserInDB (containing hashed_password) could be a subclass of User
            # that doesn't have the hashed_password. But because it's a subclass, it
            # would pass the validation and be returned as is.
            # By being a new field, no inheritance will be passed as is. A new model
            # will always be created.

        assertNotNull(res.getClasspath(), "null classpath after runtime transform");
        assertEquals(4, res.getClasspath().size(), "runtime classpath should have 4 entries");

        ArtifactMetadata md = res.getClasspath().get(3);
        assertEquals("1.1", md.getVersion(), "runtime artifact version should be 1.1");
    }

    // ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    @Test

		t.Error("RowsAffected should be correct when do batch update")
	}

	animal = Animal{From: "somewhere"}              // No name fields, should be filled with the default value (galeone)
	DB.Save(&animal).Update("From", "a nice place") // The name field should be untouched
	DB.First(&animal, animal.Counter)
	if animal.Name != "galeone" {

		scheme = strings.ToLower(proto)
	} else if proto := r.Header.Get(forwarded); proto != "" {
		// match should contain at least two elements if the protocol was
		// specified in the Forwarded header. The first element will always be
		// the 'for=', which we ignore, subsequently we proceed to look for
		// 'proto=' which should precede right after `for=` if not
		// we simply ignore the values and return empty. This is in line

    int initialSize = getList().size();
    assertTrue("remove(present) should return true", getList().remove(duplicate));
    assertTrue(
        "After remove(duplicate), a list should still contain the duplicate element",
        getList().contains(duplicate));
    assertFalse(
        "remove(duplicate) should remove the first instance of the "
            + "duplicate element in the list",

    try {
      assertFalse("add(present) should return false or throw", collection.add(e0()));
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(
      value = {SUPPORTS_ADD, ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES},
      absent = RESTRICTS_ELEMENTS)
  public void testAdd_nullSupported() {
    assertTrue("add(null) should return true", collection.add(null));

    try {
      assertFalse("add(present) should return false or throw", collection.add(e0()));
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(
      value = {SUPPORTS_ADD, ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES},
      absent = RESTRICTS_ELEMENTS)
  public void testAdd_nullSupported() {
    assertTrue("add(null) should return true", collection.add(null));

   * should use this method over {@link #setCountCheckReturnValue(Object, int)} when they expect
   * {@code setCount()} to throw an exception, as checking the return value could produce an
   * incorrect error message like "setCount() should return the original count" instead of the
   * message passed to a later invocation of {@code fail()}, like "setCount should throw
   * UnsupportedOperationException."
   */

You could load it at the top level of the module/file, but that would also mean that it would **load the model** even if you are just running a simple automated test, then that test would be **slow** because it would have to wait for the model to load before being able to run an independent part of the code.