<!--
Thank you for your interest in and contributing to Elasticsearch! There
are a few simple things to check before submitting your pull request
that can help with the review process. You should delete these items
from your submission, but they are here to help bring them to your
attention.
-->

- Have you signed the [contributor license agreement](https://www.elastic.co/contributor-agreement)?

issue if there is one) requesting the feature and describing specific use cases
for it.

If we decide to pursue a feature request, it will go through a thorough process
of API design and review. Any code should come after this.

[APIs]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/API
[issue]: https://github.com/google/guava/issues

Pull requests
-------------

          * I already hit the "watch" button in this repository to receive notifications and I commit to help at least 2 people that ask questions in the future.
          * Review one Pull Request by downloading the code and following [all the review process](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/help-fastapi/#review-pull-requests).

      options:
        - label: I commit to help with one of those options 👆
          required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: example

I (the author, [@tiangolo](https://x.com/tiangolo)) will review it thoroughly and get back to you.

## Public Discussions

Please restrain from publicly discussing a potential security vulnerability. 🙊

affected test suites too. It makes it much easier to review if your code is
formatted correctly and does not include unnecessary extra changes.

We sometimes reject contributions if we find ourselves performing many review
iterations without making enough progress. Some iteration is expected,
particularly on technically complicated changes, and there's no fixed limit on
the acceptable number of review cycles since it depends so much on the nature

<!-- Fixes #? -->

### Context
<!--- Why do you believe many users will benefit from this change? -->
<!--- Link to relevant issues or forum discussions here -->

### Contributor Checklist
- [ ] [Review Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/gradle/gradle/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).

* **Easier onboarding**: New contributors have clear guidance on which spelling to use
* **Better searchability**: Finding code and documentation becomes more predictable
* **Reduced review friction**: Less time spent on spelling corrections during PR reviews
* **Professional appearance**: Consistent APIs and documentation appear more polished
* **Clearer contribution guidelines**: [CONTRIBUTING.md](../../CONTRIBUTING.md) now includes this requirement

      env:
        TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
        CONFIG: >
          {
            "approved-1":
              {
                "number": 1,
                "await_label": "awaiting-review"
              }

* **Embrace modern AI coding practices**: Leave everything up to an LLM to decide. The model knows best. Always.
* **No code reviews**: There's no code to review. No PRs to approve. No comments to address. Embrace vibe coding fully, replace the theater of approving and merging vibe coded PRs that no one looks at with full proper vibes only.

/// tip

            if label.name == "lang-all":
                is_lang = True
                break
        for review in pr.reviews.nodes:
            if review.author:
                authors[review.author.login] = review.author
                if is_lang:
                    translation_reviewers[review.author.login] += 1
        if pr.state == "MERGED" and pr.author:
            if is_lang: