/**
 * An object representing the differences between two maps.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 2.0
 */
@DoNotMock("Use Maps.difference")
@GwtCompatible
public interface MapDifference<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object> {
  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if there are no differences between the two maps; that is, if the maps are
   * equal.
   */
  boolean areEqual();

    Object one = new Object();
    Object two = new Object();
    Object three = new Object();
    Object four = new Object();
    Object five = new Object();
    Object six = new Object();

    map.put(one, two);
    map.remove(one);
    assertNotified(listener, one, two, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT);

    map.put(two, three);
    map.remove(two, three);

one:
	RET
TEXT ·a11(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0
	JEQ one
	JMP two
one:
	ORQ R15, R15 // ERROR "when dynamic linking, R15 is clobbered by a global variable access and is used here"
two:
	RET
TEXT ·a12(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0
	JMP one
two:
	ORQ R15, R15
	RET
one:
	MOVL $0, R15
	JMP two

// Ensure 3-arg instructions get GOT-rewritten without errors.
// See issue 58735.

                .put("one", "uno", 1)
                .put("two", "dos", 6)
                .put("three", "tres", 3)
                .buildOrThrow(),
            immutableCell("one", "uno", 1),
            immutableCell("two", "dos", 2),
            immutableCell("three", "tres", 3),
            immutableCell("two", "dos", 4));
  }

	if len(users1) != 2 {
		t.Errorf("Should found two users's name in 1, 2, but got %v", len(users1))
	}

	DB.Scopes(NameIn1And2, NameIn2And3).Find(&users2)
	if len(users2) != 1 {
		t.Errorf("Should found one user's name is 2, but got %v", len(users2))
	}

	DB.Scopes(NameIn([]string{users[0].Name, users[2].Name})).Find(&users3)
	if len(users3) != 2 {
		t.Errorf("Should found two users's name in 1, 3, but got %v", len(users3))
	}

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

  Define(-1, {}, {feed1, feed2, feed3}, {add2}, {});

  // Use, run, and verify
  TF_Operation* two = ScalarConst(2, host_graph_, s_, "two");
  TF_Operation* ten = ScalarConst(10, host_graph_, s_, "ten");
  TF_Operation* func_feed = Placeholder(host_graph_, s_);
  TF_Operation* func_op = Use({two, ten, func_feed});
  Run({{func_feed, Int32Tensor(3)}}, func_op, 2 + 10 + 3);