ion(){var e=this,t=n.default("body");t.hasClass(L)||t.hasClass(D)?(n.default(k).not(this._config.target).hide(),n.default(this._config.target).css("display","block")):n.default(k).hide(),this._fixHeight(),this._fixScrollHeight(),n.default(window).resize((function(){e._fixHeight(),e._fixScrollHeight()})),n.default(window).scroll((function(){var t=n.default("body");(t.hasClass(L)||t.hasClass(D))&&e._fixScrollHeight()}))},t._isNavbarFixed=function(){var e=n.default("body");return e.hasClass("layout...

}

// Len returns the number of items in the cache.
func (c *LRU[K, V]) Len() int {
	c.mu.Lock()
	defer c.mu.Unlock()
	return c.evictList.Length()
}

// Resize changes the cache size. Size of 0 means unlimited.
func (c *LRU[K, V]) Resize(size int) (evicted int) {
	c.mu.Lock()
	defer c.mu.Unlock()
	if size <= 0 {
		c.size = 0
		return 0
	}
	diff := c.evictList.Length() - size
	if diff < 0 {

 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashMap}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger

 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>As compared with {@link java.util.LinkedHashMap}, this structure places significantly reduced
 * load on the garbage collector by only using a constant number of internal objects.
 *

      // Always presize to at least 1, since we only bother creating a value collection if there's
      // at least one element.
      this.expectedValuesPerKey = max(expectedValuesPerKey, 1);

      return this;
    }

    /**
     * By default, if we are handed a value collection bigger than expectedValuesPerKey, presize to
     * accept that many elements.
     *

 * good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far from uniform), and
 * amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>This implementation consumes significantly less memory than {@code java.util.LinkedHashSet} or
 * even {@code java.util.HashSet}, and places considerably less load on the garbage collector. Like

 * good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far from uniform), and
 * amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>This implementation consumes significantly less memory than {@code java.util.LinkedHashSet} or
 * even {@code java.util.HashSet}, and places considerably less load on the garbage collector. Like

      // Always presize to at least 1, since we only bother creating a value collection if there's
      // at least one element.
      this.expectedValuesPerKey = max(expectedValuesPerKey, 1);

      return this;
    }

    /**
     * By default, if we are handed a value collection bigger than expectedValuesPerKey, presize to
     * accept that many elements.
     *

 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashMap}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger

 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>As compared with {@link java.util.LinkedHashMap}, this structure places significantly reduced
 * load on the garbage collector by only using a constant number of internal objects.
 *