from fastapi.security import OAuth2, OAuth2PasswordRequestFormStrict
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from pydantic import BaseModel

app = FastAPI()

reusable_oauth2 = OAuth2(
    flows={
        "password": {
            "tokenUrl": "token",
            "scopes": {"read:users": "Read the users", "write:users": "Create users"},
        }
    },
    description="OAuth2 security scheme",

                }
            }
        },
        "components": {
            "securitySchemes": {
                "OAuth2PasswordBearer": {
                    "type": "oauth2",
                    "flows": {"password": {"scopes": {}, "tokenUrl": "token"}},
                }
            }
        },

                    },
                },
            },
            "securitySchemes": {
                "OAuth2PasswordBearer": {
                    "type": "oauth2",
                    "flows": {"password": {"scopes": {}, "tokenUrl": "token"}},
                }
            },
        },

                }
            },
            "components": {
                "securitySchemes": {
                    "OAuth2AuthorizationCodeBearer": {
                        "type": "oauth2",
                        "flows": {
                            "authorizationCode": {
                                "scopes": {
                                    "read": "Read access",
                                    "write": "Write access",

                }
            }
        },
        "components": {
            "securitySchemes": {
                "OAuth2PasswordBearer": {
                    "type": "oauth2",
                    "flows": {"password": {"scopes": {}, "tokenUrl": "token"}},
                }
            },
        },

Am häufigsten ist der „Implicit“-Flow.

Am sichersten ist der „Code“-Flow, die Implementierung ist jedoch komplexer, da mehr Schritte erforderlich sind. Da er komplexer ist, schlagen viele Anbieter letztendlich den „Implicit“-Flow vor.

/// note | Hinweis

Самый распространённый — «implicit flow».

Самый безопасный — «code flow», но он сложнее в реализации, так как требует больше шагов. Из‑за сложности многие провайдеры в итоге рекомендуют «implicit flow».

/// note | Примечание

Часто каждый провайдер аутентификации называет свои «flows» по‑разному — как часть бренда.

 * application-specific data to provide context when invoking session methods.</p>
 *
 * <p>This trace information is particularly useful for:</p>
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Debugging and troubleshooting request flows</li>
 *   <li>Audit logging of session operations</li>
 *   <li>Performance monitoring of nested operations</li>
 * </ul>
 *

The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

 *   <li>Project directory structures</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Requests can optionally carry trace information through {@link RequestTrace} to support:
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Debugging and troubleshooting of request flows</li>
 *   <li>Audit logging of operations</li>
 *   <li>Performance monitoring of nested operations</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This interface is designed to be extended by specific request types that handle