```markdown
# ADR-000X - Title

## Date

20YY-MM-DD

## Context

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna
aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint

suficient de sigură",badNumberOfSelectedOptionsStart:"Trebuie să alegi măcar ",badNumberOfSelectedOptionsEnd:" răspunsuri",badAlphaNumeric:"Valoarea introdusă trebuie să con însă doar caractere alfanumerice ",badAlphaNumericExtra:" și ",wrongFileSize:"Fisierul trimis este prea mare (max %s)",wrongFileType:"Se acceptă doar fisiere tip %s",groupCheckedRangeStart:"Te rog alege între ",groupCheckedTooFewStart:"Te rog alege măcar ",groupCheckedTooManyStart:"Te rog alege maxim ",groupCheckedEnd:" elemn...

@AndroidIncompatible // TODO(b/230620681): Make this available (even though we won't run it).
public class SourceSinkTester<S, T, F extends SourceSinkFactory<S, T>> extends TestCase {

  static final String LOREM_IPSUM =
      "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing "
          + "elit. Cras fringilla elit ac ipsum adipiscing vulputate. Maecenas in lorem nulla, ac "
          + "sollicitudin quam. Praesent neque elit, sodales quis vestibulum vel, pellentesque nec "

)

func FuzzReader(f *testing.F) {
	b := bytes.NewBuffer(nil)
	w := NewWriter(b)

Your API now has the power to control its own <abbr title="This is a joke, just in case. It has nothing to do with cookie consents, but it's funny that even the API can now reject the poor cookies. Have a cookie. 🍪">cookie consent</abbr>. 🤪🍪

You can use Pydantic's model configuration to `forbid` any `extra` fields:

//// tab | Python 3.9+

```Python hl_lines="10"

@AndroidIncompatible // TODO(b/230620681): Make this available (even though we won't run it).
public class SourceSinkTester<S, T, F extends SourceSinkFactory<S, T>> extends TestCase {

  static final String LOREM_IPSUM =
      "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing "
          + "elit. Cras fringilla elit ac ipsum adipiscing vulputate. Maecenas in lorem nulla, ac "
          + "sollicitudin quam. Praesent neque elit, sodales quis vestibulum vel, pellentesque nec "

   * close or flush the reader.
   *
   * <p>This is identical to {@link #copy(Readable, Appendable)} but optimized for these specific
   * types. CharBuffer has poor performance when being written into or read out of so round tripping
   * all the bytes through the buffer takes a long time. With these specialized types we can just
   * use a char array.
   *

func genLine(buf *bytes.Buffer, lineNum, n int, addNewline bool) {
	buf.Reset()
	doCR := lineNum%5 == 0
	if doCR {
		n--
	}
	for i := 0; i < n-1; i++ { // Stop early for \n.
		c := 'a' + byte(lineNum+i)
		if c == '\n' || c == '\r' { // Don't confuse us.
			c = 'N'
		}
		buf.WriteByte(c)
	}
	if addNewline {
		if doCR {
			buf.WriteByte('\r')
		}
		buf.WriteByte('\n')
	}
}

 * between hash algorithms and the data they act on, so alternate hash algorithms can't be easily
 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because
 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,
 * including those in many JDK classes.
 *
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision

 * between hash algorithms and the data they act on, so alternate hash algorithms can't be easily
 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because
 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,
 * including those in many JDK classes.
 *
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision