assertThat(graph).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets and node/edge connections are the same, but graph properties differ.
  // In this case the graphs are considered equivalent; the property differences are irrelevant.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_propertiesDiffer() {
    graph.putEdge(N1, N2);

    MutableGraph<Integer> g2 =
        GraphBuilder.from(graph).allowsSelfLoops(!graph.allowsSelfLoops()).build();

    MapDifference<Integer, String> original = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> same = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> reverse = Maps.difference(right, left);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> diff2 = Maps.difference(left, right2);

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(original, same)

 */
class ConscryptPlatform private constructor() : Platform() {
  private val provider: Provider = Conscrypt.newProvider()

  // See release notes https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/conscrypt
  // for version differences
  override fun newSSLContext(): SSLContext =
    // supports TLSv1.3 by default (version api is >= 1.4.0)
    SSLContext.getInstance("TLS", provider)

  override fun platformTrustManager(): X509TrustManager {

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Comparing two approaches to a use case side by side can make it easier to examine the
        differences between them.


        Additionally, it's very useful to us if you can provide a "straw API" — what the
        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still

Also, the best approach was to use already existing standards.

So, before even starting to code **FastAPI**, I spent several months studying the specs for OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Understanding their relationship, overlap, and differences.

## Design { #design }

Then I spent some time designing the developer "API" I wanted to have as a user (as a developer using FastAPI).

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets and node/edge connections are the same, but network properties differ.
  // (In this case the networks are considered equivalent; the property differences are irrelevant.)
  @Test
  public void equivalent_propertiesDiffer() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N2, E12);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 =
        NetworkBuilder.from(network)

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets and node/edge connections are the same, but network properties differ.
  // (In this case the networks are considered equivalent; the property differences are irrelevant.)
  @Test
  public void equivalent_propertiesDiffer() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N2, E12);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 =
        NetworkBuilder.from(network)

 also be a directory for plugins.xml and maven.properties.

* Project configuration

 At the project level all configuration is achieved by tweaking the POM. One of the differences between
 maven 1.x and 2.x is that all project parameterization occurs in the POM and not from properties
 files.

 For many of the more advanced features in Maven2 it is critical that POMs be available in the local repository.

All the data conversion, validation, documentation, etc. will still work as normally.

That way, we can declare just the differences between the models (with plaintext `password`, with `hashed_password` and without password):

{* ../../docs_src/extra_models/tutorial002_py310.py hl[7,13:14,17:18,21:22] *}

## `Union` or `anyOf` { #union-or-anyof }

			return fmt.Errorf("Expected command line argument %s, seen %s", cmdLine,
				s2.CmdLines[i])
		}
	}

	if reflect.DeepEqual(s1.MinioEnv, s2.MinioEnv) {
		return nil
	}

	// Report differences in environment variables.
	var missing []string
	var mismatching []string
	for k, v := range s1.MinioEnv {
		ev, ok := s2.MinioEnv[k]
		if !ok {
			missing = append(missing, k)
		} else if v != ev {