* control. Under low update contention, the two classes have similar characteristics. But under
 * high contention, expected throughput of this class is significantly higher, at the expense of
 * higher space consumption.
 *
 * <p>This class extends {@link Number}, but does not define methods such as {@code
 * equals}, {@code hashCode} and {@code compareTo} because instances are expected to be mutated, and

 * control. Under low update contention, the two classes have similar characteristics. But under
 * high contention, expected throughput of this class is significantly higher, at the expense of
 * higher space consumption.
 *
 * <p>This class extends {@link Number}, but does not define methods such as {@code
 * equals}, {@code hashCode} and {@code compareTo} because instances are expected to be mutated, and

 *
 * <p>This class should not be assumed to be universally superior to {@code
 * java.util.LinkedHashSet}. Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory
 * consumption at the price of moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class
 * when there is a specific reason to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */

 * control. Under low update contention, the two classes have similar characteristics. But under
 * high contention, expected throughput of this class is significantly higher, at the expense of
 * higher space consumption.
 *
 * <p>This class extends {@link Number}, but does not define methods such as {@code
 * equals}, {@code hashCode} and {@code compareTo} because instances are expected to be mutated, and

 * order. Any removal invalidates any ordering guarantees.
 *
 * <p>This class should not be assumed to be universally superior to {@code java.util.HashSet}.
 * Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory consumption at the price of
 * moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class when there is a specific reason
 * to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 * @author Jon Noack
 */

	if err != nil {
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, toAPIError(ctx, err), r.URL)
		return
	}
	// explicitly set ExpiryUpdatedAt nil as its meant for internal consumption only
	config.ExpiryUpdatedAt = nil

	configData, err := xml.Marshal(config)
	if err != nil {
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, toAPIError(ctx, err), r.URL)
		return
	}

	if withUpdatedAt {

 *
 * <p>This class should not be assumed to be universally superior to {@code
 * java.util.LinkedHashMap}. Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory
 * consumption at the price of moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class
 * when there is a specific reason to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */

	healStoppedStatus                      = "stopped"
	healFinishedStatus                     = "finished"
)

const (
	// a heal sequence with this many un-consumed heal result
	// items blocks until heal-status consumption resumes or is
	// aborted due to timeout.
	maxUnconsumedHealResultItems = 1000

	// if no heal-results are consumed (via the heal-status API)
	// for this timeout duration, the heal sequence is aborted.

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Accumulates statistics during the operation of a {@link Cache} for presentation by {@link
   * Cache#stats}. This is solely intended for consumption by {@code Cache} implementors.
   *
   * @since 10.0
   */
  public interface StatsCounter {
    /**
     * Records cache hits. This should be called when a cache request returns a cached value.
     *

   * list (counter-intuitive, but mathematically consistent).
   *
   * <p><i>Performance notes:</i> while the cartesian product of lists of size {@code m, n, p} is a
   * list of size {@code m x n x p}, its actual memory consumption is much smaller. When the
   * cartesian product is constructed, the input lists are merely copied. Only as the resulting list
   * is iterated are the individual lists created, and these are not retained after iteration.
   *