if (header.matches("\\d+".toRegex())) {
      return Integer.valueOf(header)
    }
    return Integer.MAX_VALUE
  }

  companion object {
    /**
     * How many redirects and auth challenges should we attempt? Chrome follows 21 redirects; Firefox,
     * curl, and wget follow 20; Safari follows 16; and HTTP/1.0 recommends 5.
     */
    private const val MAX_FOLLOW_UPS = 20
  }

    }

    /**
     * Test the service method when no Authorization header is present and no session exists.
     * Expects a 401 Unauthorized response with NTLM and Basic authentication challenges.
     * @throws ServletException
     * @throws IOException
     */
    @Test
    void testService_NoAuthHeader_NoSession() throws ServletException, IOException {
        ntlmServlet.init(servletConfig);

        // Since we can't mock the internal transport operations easily without real network,
        // we'll test the simpler case where no NTLM negotiation is needed
        when(request.getHeader("Authorization")).thenReturn(null);

        filter.doFilter(request, response, filterChain);

        // Should challenge the client

Although properties offer the benefit of precise user-side control and support gradual evolution practices, the high number of properties also presents challenges.

The main challenge on the user side is comprehensibility.
With that many properties, and considering the tendency for properties to accrete in user builds over time, it is important for users to understand the contracts tied to the features.

 *
 *  * [TCP handshake][connectSocket]
 *  * Optional [CONNECT tunnels][connectTunnel]. When using an HTTP proxy to reach an HTTPS server
 *    we must send a `CONNECT` request, and handle authorization challenges from the proxy.
 *  * Optional [TLS handshake][connectTls].
 *
 * Each step may fail. If a retry is possible, a new instance is created with the next plan, which
 * will be configured differently.
 */

     * @param password the password to hash
     * @param challenge the server challenge bytes
     * @return the calculated response
     * @throws GeneralSecurityException if a cryptographic error occurs
     */
    public static byte[] getNTLMResponse(final String password, final byte[] challenge) throws GeneralSecurityException {
        return getNTLMResponse(getNTHash(password), challenge);
    }

    /**

     * extracts the user principal from successful authentication.
     *
     * @return The login credential containing the authenticated username,
     *         an ActionResponseCredential for authentication challenges,
     *         or null if no authentication information is available
     * @throws SsoLoginException if SPNEGO authentication fails
     */
    @Override
    public LoginCredential getLoginCredential() {

    application code to omit a message.

 *  The challenge's scheme and realm are now non-null. If you are calling
    `new Challenge(scheme, realm)` you must provide non-null values. These were
    never null in challenges created by OkHttp, but could have been null in
    application code that creates challenges.

 *  New: The `TlsVersion` of a `Handshake` is now non-null. If you are calling

Provider they wish to use (the `MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_DISPLAY_NAME` value is shown here). The user is then redirected to the OpenID provider's login page and performs necessary login actions (e.g. entering credentials, responding to MFA authentication challenges, etc). After successful login, the user is redirected back to the MinIO console. This redirect URL is specified as a parameter by MinIO when the user is redirected to the OpenID Provider in the beginning. For some setups, extra configuration may...

  }

  @Test
  fun challenge() {
    var challenge = Challenge("", mapOf("" to ""))
    challenge = Challenge("", "")
    val scheme: String = challenge.scheme
    val authParams: Map<String?, String> = challenge.authParams
    val realm: String? = challenge.realm
    val charset: Charset = challenge.charset
    val utf8: Challenge = challenge.withCharset(Charsets.UTF_8)
  }

  @Test